Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26347340›Full record

Observational studyJournal of assisted reproduction and genetics2015

Developmentally delayed cleavage-stage embryos maintain comparable implantation rates in frozen embryo transfers.

Heather Burks, Jennifer Buckbinder, Mary Francis-Hernandez, Karine Chung, Sami Jabara, Kristin Bendikson, Richard Paulson

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Heather BurksDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, 2020 Zonal Avenue, Room 534, Los Angeles, CA, 90033, USA. hburks@med.usc.edu.
Jennifer BuckbinderDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, 2020 Zonal Avenue, Room 534, Los Angeles, CA, 90033, USA. Jennifer.Buckbinder@med.usc.edu.
Mary Francis-HernandezDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, 2020 Zonal Avenue, Room 534, Los Angeles, CA, 90033, USA. Mary.Francis-Hernandez@med.usc.edu.
Karine ChungDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, 2020 Zonal Avenue, Room 534, Los Angeles, CA, 90033, USA. Karine.Chung@med.usc.edu.
Sami JabaraDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Kaiser Permanente, 4900 W. Sunset Boulevard, Los Angeles, CA, 90027, USA. Sami.Jabara@med.usc.edu.
Kristin BendiksonDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, 2020 Zonal Avenue, Room 534, Los Angeles, CA, 90033, USA. Kristin.Bendikson@med.usc.edu.
Richard PaulsonDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, 2020 Zonal Avenue, Room 534, Los Angeles, CA, 90033, USA. rpaulson@med.usc.edu.
Southern California University for Professional Studies · USUniversity of Southern California · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeIn fresh IVF cycles, embryos reaching the eight-cell stage on day 3 of development are thought to have a higher chance of implantation than those reaching this stage on day 4. To determine whether this difference persists after cryopreservation, we compared pregnancy and implantation rates between frozen embryo transfer (FET) cycles using delayed cleavage-stage embryos (cryopreserved day 4) and normal cleavage-stage embryos (cryopreserved day 3).

methodsParticipants underwent FET between 2008 and 2012 using embryos cryopreserved on either day 3 (n = 76) or day 4 (n = 48), depending on the length of time needed to achieve the eight-cell stage. All embryos, regardless of day of cryopreservation, were thawed and transferred on the 4th day of vaginal progesterone following endometrial preparation with oral estradiol. Chi-square and Mann-Whitney U tests were used to compare patient demographics and cycle outcomes.

resultsMore women in the day 4 group had diminished ovarian reserve (44 vs 16 %, p = 0.003). Pregnancy outcomes in preceding fresh cycles were not different between the two groups. Pregnancy, implantation, and live birth rates following FET did not differ between the day 3 and day 4 groups.

conclusionsThis is the first study to address outcomes using day 3 versus day 4 cryopreserved embryos. Despite a higher prevalence of diminished ovarian reserve (DOR) in the day 4 group, delayed cleavage-stage embryos utilized in FET cycles performed as well as embryos growing at the normal rate, suggesting delayed embryo development does not affect embryo implantation as long as endometrial synchrony is maintained.

Indexed as

Administration, IntravaginalAdultBlastocystCleavage Stage, OvumCohort StudiesCryopreservationEmbryo ImplantationEmbryo TransferFemaleHumansLive BirthMiddle AgedPregnancyPregnancy RateProgesteroneRetrospective StudiesProgesteroneCleavage-stage embryoDelayed embryo developmentEmbryo cryopreservationFrozen embryo transfer

Identifiers

PMID26347340
PMCPMC4615912
OpenAlexW1490161414

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.