Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26347132›Full record

ReviewDrugs2015

Prognostic and Predictive Value of RAS Gene Mutations in Colorectal Cancer: Moving Beyond KRAS Exon 2.

Nele Boeckx, Marc Peeters, Guy Van Camp, Patrick Pauwels, Ken Op de Beeck, Vanessa Deschoolmeester

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Drugs, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Nele BoeckxCenter for Oncological Research Antwerp, University of Antwerp, Campus Drie Eiken, Universiteitsplein 1, Wilrijk, 2610, Antwerp, Belgium. Nele.Boeckx@uantwerpen.be.
Marc PeetersCenter for Oncological Research Antwerp, University of Antwerp, Campus Drie Eiken, Universiteitsplein 1, Wilrijk, 2610, Antwerp, Belgium. Marc.Peeters@uza.be.
Guy Van CampCenter for Medical Genetics, University of Antwerp, Antwerp University Hospital, Campus Drie Eiken, Universiteitsplein 1, Wilrijk, 2610, Antwerp, Belgium. Guy.Vancamp@uantwerpen.be.
Patrick PauwelsCenter for Oncological Research Antwerp, University of Antwerp, Campus Drie Eiken, Universiteitsplein 1, Wilrijk, 2610, Antwerp, Belgium. Patrick.Pauwels@uza.be.
Ken Op de BeeckCenter for Oncological Research Antwerp, University of Antwerp, Campus Drie Eiken, Universiteitsplein 1, Wilrijk, 2610, Antwerp, Belgium. Ken.Opdebeeck@uantwerpen.be.
Vanessa DeschoolmeesterCenter for Oncological Research Antwerp, University of Antwerp, Campus Drie Eiken, Universiteitsplein 1, Wilrijk, 2610, Antwerp, Belgium. Vanessa.Deschoolmeester@uantwerpen.be.
University of Antwerp · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The advent of anti-EGFR (epidermal growth factor receptor) therapy resulted in significant progress in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer patients. However, many patients do not respond to this therapy or develop acquired resistance within a few months after the start of treatment. Since 2008, anti-EGFR therapy is restricted to KRAS wild-type patients as it has been shown that KRAS exon 2-mutated patients do not respond to this therapy. Still, up to 60 % of KRAS exon 2 wild-type patients show primary resistance to this treatment. Recently, several studies investigating the predictive and prognostic role of RAS mutations other than in KRAS exon 2 demonstrated that patients with these mutations are not responding to therapy. However, the role of these mutations has long been questioned as The National Comprehensive Cancer Network Guidelines in Oncology and the European Medicines Agency indications had already been changed in order to restrict anti-EGFR therapy to all RAS wild-type colorectal cancer patients, while the Food and Drug Administration guidelines remained unchanged. Recently, the Food and Drug Administration guidelines have also been changed, which implies the importance of RAS mutations beyond KRAS exon 2 in colorectal cancer. In this review, we discuss the most important studies regarding the predictive and prognostic role of RAS mutations other than in KRAS exon 2 in order to demonstrate the importance of these RAS mutations in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer treated with anti-EGFR therapy.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsColorectal NeoplasmsErbB ReceptorsExonsGenes, rasHumansPredictive Value of TestsPrognosisProto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)Antineoplastic AgentsErbB ReceptorsKRAS protein, humanProto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)

Identifiers

PMID26347132
OpenAlexW2097943106

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.