ReviewMolecular ecology2016
Can the experimental evolution programme help us elucidate the genetic basis of adaptation in nature?
Review in Molecular ecology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
33 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evolutionary Dynamics of Gene Expression During Thermal Adaptation in Drosophila subobscura.Genome biology and evolution · 2026Article
- Resisting the gallium "Trojan horse": Experimental evolutionary insights into microbial resistance.Gene & protein in disease · 2026Article
- Reconciling theories of dominance with the relative rates of adaptive substitution on sex chromosomes and autosomes.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024Article
- When and how can we predict adaptive responses to climate change?Evolution letters · 2024Article
- Experimental evidence that network topology can accelerate the spread of beneficial mutations.Evolution letters · 2023Article
- Bacterial-fungal interactions promote parallel evolution of global transcriptional regulators in a widespread Staphylococcus species.The ISME journal · 2023Article
- Identifying Targets of Selection in Laboratory Evolution Experiments.Journal of molecular evolution · 2023Review
- Article
- Genome Scan of Rice Landrace Populations Collected Across Time Revealed Climate Changes' Selective Footprints in the Genes Network Regulating Flowering Time.Rice (New York, N.Y.) · 2023Article
- Antifungal alternation can be beneficial for durability but at the cost of generalist resistance.Communications biology · 2023Article
- Evolution of manipulative microbial behaviors in the rhizosphere.Evolutionary applications · 2022Review
- Editorial: Integrating multi-scale approaches for predicting microbiome ecology and evolution.Frontiers in microbiology · 2022Article
- Are Efficient-Dose Mixtures a Solution to Reduce Fungicide Load and Delay Evolution of Resistance? An Experimental Evolutionary Approach.Microorganisms · 2021Article
- Crossing design shapes patterns of genetic variation in synthetic recombinant populations of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Adaptation and correlated fitness responses over two time scales in Drosophila suzukii populations evolving in different environments.Journal of evolutionary biology · 2021Article
- Experimental Evolution in Plant-Microbe Systems: A Tool for Deciphering the Functioning and Evolution of Plant-Associated Microbial Communities.Frontiers in microbiology · 2021Review
- Inferring Parameters of the Distribution of Fitness Effects of New Mutations When Beneficial Mutations Are Strongly Advantageous and Rare.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2020Article
- Combining Experimental Evolution and Genomics to Understand How Seed Beetles Adapt to a Marginal Host Plant.Genes · 2020Article
- Article
- Evolutionary Dynamics in the RNA Bacteriophage Qβ Depends on the Pattern of Change in Selective Pressures.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
There have been a variety of approaches taken to try to characterize and identify the genetic basis of adaptation in nature, spanning theoretical models, experimental evolution studies and direct tests of natural populations. Theoretical models can provide formalized and detailed hypotheses regarding evolutionary processes and patterns, from which experimental evolution studies can then provide important proofs of concepts and characterize what is biologically reasonable. Genetic and genomic data from natural populations then allow for the identification of the particular factors that have and continue to play an important role in shaping adaptive evolution in the natural world. Further to this, experimental evolution studies allow for tests of theories that may be difficult or impossible to test in natural populations for logistical and methodological reasons and can even generate new insights, suggesting further refinement of existing theories. However, as experimental evolution studies often take place in a very particular set of controlled conditions--that is simple environments, a small range of usually asexual species, relatively short timescales--the question remains as to how applicable these experimental results are to natural populations. In this review, we discuss important insights coming from experimental evolution, focusing on four key topics tied to the evolutionary genetics of adaptation, and within those topics, we discuss the extent to which the experimental work compliments and informs natural population studies. We finish by making suggestions for future work in particular a need for natural population genomic time series data, as well as the necessity for studies that combine both experimental evolution and natural population approaches.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.