Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26346751›Full record

Trial reportBMC geriatrics2015

Are exergames promoting mobility an attractive alternative to conventional self-regulated exercises for elderly people in a rehabilitation setting? Study protocol of a randomized controlled trial.

Viviane Hasselmann, Peter Oesch, Luis Fernandez-Luque, Stefan Bachmann

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC geriatrics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02077049 (Are Serious Games Promoting Mobility an Attractive Alternative to Conventional Self-training for Elderly People? A Randomized Controlled Trial.), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02077049 nacompletednot on this map

Are Serious Games Promoting Mobility an Attractive Alternative to Conventional Self-training for Elderly People? A Randomized Controlled Trial.

TypeinterventionalSponsorKlinik ValensRan2014 to 2015Enrolled54ConditionsMobility Limitations, Geriatric DisorderArmsserious games, Conventional self-training
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Design and Evaluation of an Augmented Reality-Based Exergame System to Reduce Fall Risk in the Elderly.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Understanding older adults' perceptions of and attitudes towards exergames.Gerontechnology : international journal on the fundamental aspects of technology to serve the ageing society · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Viviane HasselmannRehabilitationsklinik Walenstadtberg, Walenstadtberg, Switzerland. viviane.hasselmann@wanadoo.fr.
Peter OeschRehabilitationsklinik Valens, 7317, Valens, Switzerland. peter.oesch@kliniken-valens.ch.
Luis Fernandez-LuqueUniversity of Seville, Seville, Spain. luis.luque@norut.no.
Stefan BachmannRehabilitationsklinik Walenstadtberg, Walenstadtberg, Switzerland. stefan.bachmann@kliniken-valens.ch.
Valens Clinics · CHUniversidad de Sevilla · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMaintaining mobility in elderly persons has become a primary goal within healthcare services. In older adults, exercise programs significantly reduce the risk of falling and death. Long-lasting and high-intensive multi-component exercises are most effective. In a rehabilitation setting, self-regulated exercises are conventionally taught by physiotherapists, using handouts. However, the adherence of elderly persons to executing these self-administered programs varies considerably. They are often considered tedious and boring, and thus prematurely stopped. The primary aim of this clinical trial is to determine whether elderly persons in a rehabilitation setting show higher adherence to self-regulated training when using exergames than when performing conventional exercises. The second objective is to explore which mode of exercise leads to greater improvement in balance performance. METHODS/

designThe study consists of a single blind, stratified, randomized control trial with two parallel groups. Once included, study participants will be stratified according to their balance and computer skills and randomly allocated to self-regulated training with conventional exercise programs or with exergames played with the Windows Kinect® sensor and FitBit® pedometer. In both groups, self-administered exercise programs will be taught by experienced physiotherapists and performed at the patient's own discretion during the ten days of intervention. The primary outcome is the performed daily training volume, collected by the participants in a logbook. Secondary outcomes are objective and subjective balance skills measured by an activity tracker and the Fall Efficacy Scale self-administered questionnaire. Both assessments will be performed at pre- and post-intervention. DISCUSSION: According to the available literature, this study is the first to compare conventional self-regulated exercises with exergames among older patients in a rehabilitation setting. Results of this study will contribute to our understanding of its motivational potential on exercise adherence in elderly persons and provide more insight into the potential effectiveness of exergames promoting mobility.

trial registrationThe present clinical study has been registered on ClinicalTrials.gov under the identifier number: NCT02077049. The detailed trial protocol can be accessed online on: NCT02077049.

Indexed as

Accidental FallsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overExerciseExercise TherapyFemaleHumansMaleRehabilitationSingle-Blind MethodSurveys and QuestionnairesVideo Games

Identifiers

PMID26346751
PMCPMC4562105
OpenAlexW1887486449

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.