Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26346127›Full record

SynthesisJournal of cancer survivorship : research and practice2016

Cancer survivorship services for indigenous peoples: where we stand, where to improve? A systematic review.

Bridget M Cavanagh, Claire E Wakefield, Jordana K McLoone, Gail Garvey, Richard J Cohn

Open access · greenAbstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Interventions to improve cancer survivorship among Indigenous Peoples and communities: a systematic review with a narrative synthesis.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2021
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Improving preventive screening with Indigenous peoples.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2021
    Article
  11. Améliorer le dépistage chez les patients autochtones.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. From Sorcery to Laboratory: Pandemics and Yanyuwa Experiences of Viral Vulnerability.Oceania; a journal devoted to the study of the native peoples of Australia, New Guinea, and the Islands of the Pacific · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Cancer Services and Their Initiatives to Improve the Care of Indigenous Australians.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Bridget M CavanaghDiscipline of Paediatrics, School of Women's and Children's Health, UNSW Medicine, University of New South Wales, Kensington, NSW, Australia. b.cavanagh@student.unsw.edu.au.
Claire E WakefieldDiscipline of Paediatrics, School of Women's and Children's Health, UNSW Medicine, University of New South Wales, Kensington, NSW, Australia.
Jordana K McLooneDiscipline of Paediatrics, School of Women's and Children's Health, UNSW Medicine, University of New South Wales, Kensington, NSW, Australia.
Gail GarveyMenzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, Northern Territory, Australia.
Richard J CohnDiscipline of Paediatrics, School of Women's and Children's Health, UNSW Medicine, University of New South Wales, Kensington, NSW, Australia.
Sydney Children's Hospital · AUUNSW Sydney · AUCharles Darwin University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThere are few support programs with evidence-based practices which address the needs of cancer survivors from indigenous populations. This systematic review analysed the experiences and current support services for cancer survivors from indigenous populations following the cessation of cancer treatment.

methodsThe data sourced for this article was identified from a systematic search of five databases (MEDLINE, MEDLINE In-Process, PyscINFO, CINAHL, and EMBASE). Studies were selected if they described the experiences of indigenous cancer survivors, their families, and/or clinicians primarily responsible for their care. In total 208 unique abstracts were screened, from which 17 studies were identified as having fulfilled all selection criteria.

resultsOf the 17 articles reviewed, 12 described qualitative data and 5 provided quantitative data. Common themes identified included the importance of family support throughout the survivorship period, the negative effect of community stigmatization, fatalistic attitudes towards cancer, and the importance of spirituality in coping with, and understanding, the cancer experience. Potential barriers to accessing care included distance and difficulties revisiting the survivor's cancer experience due to an associated fear of cancer recurrence.

conclusionsIndigenous cancer survivors would benefit from survivorship programs more specifically tailored to their individual circumstances, such as personalized spiritual care, facilitation of increased involvement of family members, and connection to other indigenous cancer survivors. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: The results from this review indicate that there is a need for survivorship care to be shaped specifically for the needs of indigenous cancer survivors.

Indexed as

HumansNeoplasmsPopulation GroupsSurvival RateSurvivorsCancerIndigenousOncologySurvivorship

Identifiers

PMID26346127
OpenAlexW1483720853

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.