ArticleBioTechniques2015
Functional enrichment by direct plasmid recovery after fluorescence activated cell sorting.
Article in BioTechniques, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Identification of a potent PCNA-p15-interaction inhibitor by autodisplay-based peptide library screening.Microbial biotechnology · 2024Article
- Rapid Evaluation of Staple Placement in Stabilized α Helices Using Bacterial Surface Display.ACS chemical biology · 2023Article
- Directed Evolution Using Stabilized Bacterial Peptide Display.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2020Article
- Analysis of amino acid substitutions in AraC variants that respond to triacetic acid lactone.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Iterative screening of expressed protein libraries using fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) typically involves culturing the pooled clones after each sort. In these experiments, if cell viability is compromised by the sort conditions and/or expression of the target protein(s), rescue PCR provides an alternative to culturing but requires re-cloning and can introduce amplification bias. We have optimized a simple protocol using commercially available reagents to directly recover plasmid DNA from sorted cells for subsequent transformation. We tested our protocol with 2 different screening systems in which <10% of sorted cells survive culturing and demonstrate that >60% of the sorted cell population was recovered.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.