Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26345389›Full record

ArticleProstate cancer and prostatic diseases2015

A molecular signature of PCA3 and ERG exosomal RNA from non-DRE urine is predictive of initial prostate biopsy result.

M J Donovan, M Noerholm, S Bentink, S Belzer, J Skog, V O'Neill, J S Cochran, G A Brown

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03031418 (Clinical Evaluation of the 'ExoDx Prostate IntelliScore' in Men Presenting for Initial Biopsy; Additional Confirmation Study Including Impact on Decision-making and Health Economics.), which is not on this map. Cited by 104 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
104citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03031418 completednot on this mapstarted 2016, after this paper: background citation

Clinical Evaluation of the 'ExoDx Prostate IntelliScore' in Men Presenting for Initial Biopsy; Additional Confirmation Study Including Impact on Decision-making and Health Economics.

TypeobservationalSponsorExosome Diagnostics, Inc.Ran2016 to 2018Enrolled532ConditionsCancer of ProstateArmsExoDx Prostate Intelliscore
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

104 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Guideline
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review

44 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

M J DonovanDepartment of Pathology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
M NoerholmExosome Diagnostics, Cambridge, MA, USA.
S BentinkExosome Diagnostics, Cambridge, MA, USA.
S BelzerExosome Diagnostics, Cambridge, MA, USA.
J SkogExosome Diagnostics, Cambridge, MA, USA.
V O'NeillExosome Diagnostics, Cambridge, MA, USA.
J S CochranUrology Clinics of North Texas, Dallas, TX, USA.
G A BrownDelaware Valley Urology, LLC, Voorhees, NJ, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNew screening methods that can add predictive diagnostic value for aggressive (high-grade, Gleason score ⩾ 7) prostate cancer (PCa) are needed to reduce unnecessary biopsies for patients with non-aggressive PCa. This is particularly important for men presenting for an initial biopsy with an equivocal PSA in the 2-10 ng ml(-1) range. PCA3 and ERG are biomarkers that can add predictive value for PCa in urine; however, with a limited utility as a digital rectal exam (DRE) is required.

methodsFirst-catch urine samples were collected at six sites from men scheduled to undergo a prostate biopsy. Exosomal RNA was extracted, RNA copy numbers of ERG and PCA3 were measured by reverse transcription-quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR), and the EXO106 score (the sum of normalized PCA3 and ERG RNA levels) was computed. Performance was compared with standard of care (SOC; PSA, age, race or family history) parameters. Contingency table, logistic regression, receiver operating characteristics curve and box-plot analyses were performed.

resultsIn this cohort (N=195), a dichotomous EXO106 score demonstrated good clinical performance in predicting biopsy result for both any cancer and high-grade disease. For high-grade disease, the negative and positive predictive values were 97.5% and 34.5%, respectively. The discrimination between high-grade and Gleason score ⩽ 6 (including benign) biopsy results by a combination of EXO106 and SOC (area under the curve (AUC)=0.803) was significantly improved compared with SOC without EXO106 (AUC=0.6723, P=0.0009). The median EXO106 score correlated (P<0.001; Spearman's rank order) with histologic grade.

conclusionsA novel molecular signature (EXO106 score) derived from non-DRE urine demonstrated independent, negative predictive value for the diagnosis of high-grade PCa from initial biopsy for men with 'gray zone' serum PSA levels. Its use in the biopsy decision process could result in fewer prostate biopsies for clinically insignificant disease.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorRNAAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntigens, NeoplasmBiopsyExosomesHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm GradingPrognosisProstatic NeoplasmsReproducibility of ResultsROC CurveAntigens, NeoplasmBiomarkers, TumorERG protein, humanprostate cancer antigen 3, humanRNATrans-ActivatorsTranscriptional Regulator ERG

Identifiers

PMID26345389

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.