ArticleProteins2016
Protein structure prediction using residue- and fragment-environment potentials in CASP11.
Article in Proteins, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- AAindexNC: Estimating the Physicochemical Properties of Non-Canonical Amino Acids, Including Those Derived from the PDB and PDBeChem Databank.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Protein Docking Model Evaluation by Graph Neural Networks.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2021Article
- Article
- Protein docking model evaluation by 3D deep convolutional neural networks.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2020Article
- Improved performance in CAPRI round 37 using LZerD docking and template-based modeling with combined scoring functions.Proteins · 2018Article
- An overview of comparative modelling and resources dedicated to large-scale modelling of genome sequences.Acta crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology · 2017Review
- Human and server docking prediction for CAPRI round 30-35 using LZerD with combined scoring functions.Proteins · 2017Article
- Discovery of Nicotinamide Adenine Dinucleotide Binding Proteins in the Escherichia coli Proteome Using a Combined Energetic- and Structural-Bioinformatics-Based Approach.Journal of proteome research · 2017Article
- Prediction of Local Quality of Protein Structure Models Considering Spatial Neighbors in Graphical Models.Scientific reports · 2017Article
- Ensemble-based evaluation for protein structure models.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2016Article
- CASP11--An Evaluation of a Modular BCL::Fold-Based Protein Structure Prediction Pipeline.PloS one · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
An accurate scoring function that can select near-native structure models from a pool of alternative models is key for successful protein structure prediction. For the critical assessment of techniques for protein structure prediction (CASP) 11, we have built a protocol of protein structure prediction that has novel coarse-grained scoring functions for selecting decoys as the heart of its pipeline. The score named PRESCO (Protein Residue Environment SCOre) developed recently by our group evaluates the native-likeness of local structural environment of residues in a structure decoy considering positions and the depth of side-chains of spatially neighboring residues. We also introduced a helix interaction potential as an additional scoring function for selecting decoys. The best models selected by PRESCO and the helix interaction potential underwent structure refinement, which includes side-chain modeling and relaxation with a short molecular dynamics simulation. Our protocol was successful, achieving the top rank in the free modeling category with a significant margin of the accumulated Z-score to the subsequent groups when the top 1 models were considered. Proteins 2016; 84(Suppl 1):105-117. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.