ReviewVaccines2013
Sustaining Vaccine Confidence in the 21st Century.
Review in Vaccines, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development and validation of an Arabic tool for assessment of post-vaccination confidence in COVID-19 vaccines (ARAB-VAX-CONF).The Journal of the Egyptian Public Health Association · 2024Article
- Article
- The intent of students to vaccinate is influenced by cultural factors, peer network, and knowledge about vaccines.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2022Article
- Vaccination coverage determinants in low uptake areas of China: a qualitative study of provider perspectives in Sichuan, Guangdong, and Henan Provinces.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2022Article
- Preventable Disease, the Case of Colorado: School District Demographics and Childhood Immunizations.Vaccines · 2022Article
- Article
- Article
- Using a Global Pandemic as a Teachable Moment to Promote Vaccine Literacy and Build Resilience to Misinformation.American journal of public health · 2020Article
- Vaccine confidence in China after the Changsheng vaccine incident: a cross-sectional study.BMC public health · 2019Article
- Vaccine Safety and Surveillance for Adverse Events Following Immunization (AEFI) in India.Indian journal of pediatrics · 2018Review
- The assessment of Hantaan virus-specific antibody responses after the immunization program for hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome in northwest China.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2017Article
- Vaccine criticism on the Internet: Propositions for future research.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2016Article
- Article
- Vaccine Adjuvants: from 1920 to 2015 and Beyond.Vaccines · 2015Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Vaccination provides many health and economic benefits to individuals and society, and public support for immunization programs is generally high. However, the benefits of vaccines are often not fully valued when public discussions on vaccine safety, quality or efficacy arise, and the spread of misinformation via the internet and other media has the potential to undermine immunization programs. Factors associated with improved public confidence in vaccines include evidence-based decision-making procedures and recommendations, controlled processes for licensing and monitoring vaccine safety and effectiveness and disease surveillance. Community engagement with appropriate communication approaches for each audience is a key factor in building trust in vaccines. Vaccine safety/quality issues should be handled rapidly and transparently by informing and involving those most affected and those concerned with public health in effective ways. Openness and transparency in the exchange of information between industry and other stakeholders is also important. To maximize the safety of vaccines, and thus sustain trust in vaccines, partnerships are needed between public health sector stakeholders. Vaccine confidence can be improved through collaborations that ensure high vaccine uptake rates and that inform the public and other stakeholders of the benefits of vaccines and how vaccine safety is constantly assessed, assured and communicated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.