Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26343927›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials2016

Injected biodegradable polyurethane scaffolds support tissue infiltration and delay wound contraction in a porcine excisional model.

Elizabeth J Adolph, Ruijing Guo, Alonda C Pollins, Katarzyna Zienkiewicz, Nancy Cardwell, Jeffrey M Davidson, Scott A Guelcher, Lillian B Nanney

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Biomimetic polyurethane/TiOMaterials science & engineering. C, Materials for biological applications · 2018
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Chitosan-Poly(caprolactone) Nanofibers for Skin Repair.Journal of materials chemistry. B · 2017
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Elizabeth J AdolphDepartment of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee.
Ruijing GuoDepartment of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee.
Alonda C PollinsDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.
Katarzyna ZienkiewiczDepartment of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee.
Nancy CardwellDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.
Jeffrey M DavidsonResearch Service, VA Tennessee Valley Healthcare System, Nashville, Tennessee.
Scott A GuelcherDepartment of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee.
Lillian B NanneyDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee. Lillian.nanney@vanderbilt.edu.

Funding

Skin Regeneration with Stem Cells and ScaffoldsR01AR056138 · NIAMS · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI DAVIDSON, JEFFREY M., GUELCHER, SCOTT A · 2009 to 2013
$3.3M
NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR056138
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The filling of wound cavities with new tissue is a challenge. We previously reported on the physical properties and wound healing kinetics of prefabricated, gas-blown polyurethane (PUR) scaffolds in rat and porcine excisional wounds. To address the capability of this material to fill complex wound cavities, this study examined the in vitro and in vivo reparative characteristics of injected PUR scaffolds employing a sucrose porogen. Using the porcine excisional wound model, we compared reparative outcomes to both preformed and injected scaffolds as well as untreated wounds at 9, 13, and 30 days after scaffold placement. Both injected and preformed scaffolds delayed wound contraction by 19% at 9 days and 12% at 13 days compared to nontreated wounds. This stenting effect proved transient since both formulations degraded by day 30. Both types of scaffolds significantly inhibited the undesirable alignment of collagen and fibroblasts through day 13. Injected scaffolds were highly compatible with sentinel cellular events of normal wound repair cell proliferation, apoptosis, and blood vessel density. The present study provides further evidence that either injected or preformed PUR scaffolds facilitate wound healing, support tissue infiltration and matrix production, delay wound contraction, and reduce scarring in a clinically relevant animal model, which underscores their potential utility as a void-filling platform for large cutaneous defects. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part B: Appl Biomater, 104B: 1679-1690, 2016.

Indexed as

Absorbable ImplantsBiodegradable PlasticsPolyurethanesAnimalsDisease Models, AnimalSwineTissue ScaffoldsWound HealingWounds and InjuriesBiodegradable PlasticsPolyurethanesbiodegradablepolyurethane scaffoldporcine modelwound contractionwound repair

Identifiers

PMID26343927
PMCPMC4837087

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.