ArticleCurrent treatment options in gastroenterology2015
Neuroenteric Stimulation for Gastroparesis.
Article in Current treatment options in gastroenterology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Sepiapterin alleviates impaired gastric nNOS function in spontaneous diabetic female rodents through NRF2 mRNA turnover and miRNA biogenesis pathway.American journal of physiology. Gastrointestinal and liver physiology · 2018Article
- Diabetes and the Stomach.Current treatment options in gastroenterology · 2017Review
- Profound opiate toxicity in gastroparesis following therapeutic dose.BMJ case reports · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
opinion statementGastroparesis (GP) is a syndrome characterized by delayed gastric emptying in association with symptoms of epigastric pain, nausea, and vomiting in the absence of mechanical obstruction. The prevalence of gastroparesis has been estimated at 24 per 100,000, with women more commonly affected than men. Diabetes appears to be the underlying cause in approximately 25 % of patients, while connective tissue disorders, autoimmune disorders, prior gastric surgery, ischemia, and medications make up a smaller percentage of the remaining identifiable causes. However, the largest group of GP patients falls into the idiopathic category (~50 %); many of these patients likely develop GP as a result of a prior viral infection. Symptoms of gastroparesis develop due to a number of different pathophysiologic processes, including disorders of fundic accommodation, antroduodenal dyscoordination, a weak antral pump, gastric dysrhythmias, abnormal duodenal feedback, and enhanced visceral sensation. Once the diagnosis of GP is made, the clinician has a number of different treatment options. For patients with mild to moderate symptoms, dietary modifications in conjunction with or without prokinetics and antiemetics are often all that is required. However, many patients with severe symptoms who fail to respond to standard therapy may benefit from neuroenteric stimulation (gastric electrical stimulation). This monograph will review the role of the neuroenteric stimulator therapy for gastroparesis, discuss possible mechanisms of action of neuroenteric stimulation, review data from recently published studies on its efficacy, and discuss patient selection and adverse events.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.