Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26343196›Full record

ReviewVaccines2015

Emerging Vaccine Technologies.

Rebecca J Loomis, Philip R Johnson

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Vaccines, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Immunogenicity of HIV-1Vaccines · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Moving beyond Titers.Vaccines · 2022
    Review
  8. Review
  9. High-throughput Sequencing in Vaccine Research.Journal of veterinary research · 2021
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Vectored immunoprophylaxis: an emerging adjunct to traditional vaccination.Tropical diseases, travel medicine and vaccines · 2017
    Review
  19. Vaccination to gain humoral immune memory.Clinical & translational immunology · 2016
    Review
  20. Successful completion of a semi-automated enzyme-free cloning method.Journal of structural and functional genomics · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Rebecca J LoomisThe Children's Hospital of Philadelphia Research Institute, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA. loomisr@email.chop.edu.
Philip R JohnsonThe Children's Hospital of Philadelphia Research Institute, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA. johnsonphi@email.chop.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vaccination has proven to be an invaluable means of preventing infectious diseases by reducing both incidence of disease and mortality. However, vaccines have not been effectively developed for many diseases including HIV-1, hepatitis C virus (HCV), tuberculosis and malaria, among others. The emergence of new technologies with a growing understanding of host-pathogen interactions and immunity may lead to efficacious vaccines against pathogens, previously thought impossible.

Indexed as

epitope-scaffoldimmunoprophylaxisreverse vaccinologystructural vaccinologyvaccine

Identifiers

PMID26343196
PMCPMC4494353

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.