Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26343190›Full record

ReviewVaccines2015

Vaccine Adjuvants: from 1920 to 2015 and Beyond.

Alberta Di Pasquale, Scott Preiss, Fernanda Tavares Da Silva, Nathalie Garçon

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Vaccines, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 286 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
286citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
19.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

286 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 630 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Controlling timing and location in vaccines.Advanced drug delivery reviews · 2020
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Proteomic Analysis of Influenza.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2026
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review

226 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Alberta Di PasqualeGSK Vaccines, Avenue Fleming, 1300 Wavre, Belgium. alberta.di-pasquale@gsk.com.
Scott PreissGSK Vaccines, Avenue Fleming, 1300 Wavre, Belgium. scott.s.preiss@gsk.com.
Fernanda Tavares Da SilvaGSK Vaccines, Avenue Fleming, 1300 Wavre, Belgium. fernanda.tavares@gsk.com.
Nathalie GarçonBioaster, 321 Avenue Jean Jaurès, 6700 Lyon, France. nathalie.garcon@bioaster.org.
GlaxoSmithKline (Belgium) · BEBIOASTER · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The concept of stimulating the body's immune response is the basis underlying vaccination. Vaccines act by initiating the innate immune response and activating antigen presenting cells (APCs), thereby inducing a protective adaptive immune response to a pathogen antigen. Adjuvants are substances added to vaccines to enhance the immunogenicity of highly purified antigens that have insufficient immunostimulatory capabilities, and have been used in human vaccines for more than 90 years. While early adjuvants (aluminum, oil-in-water emulsions) were used empirically, rapidly increasing knowledge on how the immune system interacts with pathogens means that there is increased understanding of the role of adjuvants and how the formulation of modern vaccines can be better tailored towards the desired clinical benefit. Continuing safety evaluation of licensed vaccines containing adjuvants/adjuvant systems suggests that their individual benefit-risk profile remains favorable. Adjuvants contribute to the initiation of the innate immune response induced by antigens; exemplified by inflammatory responses at the injection site, with mostly localized and short-lived effects. Activated effectors (such as APCs) then move to draining lymph nodes where they direct the type, magnitude and quality of the adaptive immune response. Thus, the right match of antigens and adjuvants can potentiate downstream adaptive immune responses, enabling the development of new efficacious vaccines. Many infectious diseases of worldwide significance are not currently preventable by vaccination. Adjuvants are the most advanced new technology in the search for new vaccines against challenging pathogens and for vulnerable populations that respond poorly to traditional vaccines.

Indexed as

adaptive immune responseadjuvantimmune responseimmunogenicityinnate immune responsesafetyvaccine

Identifiers

PMID26343190
PMCPMC4494348
OpenAlexW2120404094

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.