Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26342993›Full record

ArticleCytotherapy2015

Phenotypic and functional characterization of macrophages with therapeutic potential generated from human cirrhotic monocytes in a cohort study.

Joanna K Moore, Alison C Mackinnon, Dvina Wojtacha, Caroline Pope, Alasdair R Fraser, Paul Burgoyne, Laura Bailey, Chloe Pass, Anne Atkinson, Neil W A Mcgowan and 4 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cytotherapy, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Protozoan-Derived Cytokine-Transgenic Macrophages Reverse Hepatic Fibrosis.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Macrophage cytotherapy on liver cirrhosis.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2023
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Joanna K MooreMRC Centre for Regenerative Medicine, Max Born Crescent, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Alison C MackinnonMRC Centre for Regenerative Medicine, Max Born Crescent, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Dvina WojtachaMRC Centre for Regenerative Medicine, Max Born Crescent, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Caroline PopeScottish Universities Life Sciences Alliance (SULSA), Max Born Crescent, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Alasdair R FraserResearch, Development and Innovation, Scottish National Blood Transfusion Service, Ellen's Glen Road, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Paul BurgoyneResearch, Development and Innovation, Scottish National Blood Transfusion Service, Ellen's Glen Road, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Laura BaileyResearch, Development and Innovation, Scottish National Blood Transfusion Service, Ellen's Glen Road, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Chloe PassResearch, Development and Innovation, Scottish National Blood Transfusion Service, Ellen's Glen Road, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Anne AtkinsonResearch, Development and Innovation, Scottish National Blood Transfusion Service, Ellen's Glen Road, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Neil W A McgowanResearch, Development and Innovation, Scottish National Blood Transfusion Service, Ellen's Glen Road, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Lynn MansonScottish National Blood Transfusion Service, Edinburgh Royal Infirmary, United Kingdom.
Mark L TurnerResearch, Development and Innovation, Scottish National Blood Transfusion Service, Ellen's Glen Road, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; Scottish National Blood Transfusion Service, Edinburgh Royal Infirmary, United Kingdom.
John D M CampbellResearch, Development and Innovation, Scottish National Blood Transfusion Service, Ellen's Glen Road, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Stuart J ForbesMRC Centre for Regenerative Medicine, Max Born Crescent, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom. Electronic address: stuart.forbes@ed.ac.uk.
Scottish National Blood Transfusion Service · GBUniversity of Edinburgh · GBEdinburgh Royal Infirmary · GBMRC Centre for Regenerative Medicine · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/K017047/1Medical Research Council MR/K026666/1Medical Research Council MR/L012766/1Medical Research Council MR/M007588/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND

aimsMacrophages have complex roles in the liver. The aim of this study was to compare profiles of human monocyte-derived macrophages between controls and cirrhotic patients, to determine whether chronic inflammation affects precursor number or the phenotype, with the eventual aim to develop a cell therapy for cirrhosis.

methodsInfusion of human macrophages in a murine liver fibrosis model demonstrated a decrease in markers of liver injury (alanine transaminase, bilirubin, aspartate transaminase) and fibrosis (transforming growth factor-β, α-smooth muscle actin, phosphatidylserine receptor) and an increase in markers of liver regeneration (matrix metalloproteinases [MMP]-9, MMP-12 and TNF-related weak inducer of apoptosis). CD14+ monocytes were then isolated from controls. Monocytes were matured into macrophages for 7 days using a Good Manufacturing Practice-compatible technique.

resultsThere was no significant difference between the mean number of CD14+ monocytes isolated from cirrhotic patients (n = 9) and controls (n = 10); 2.8 ± SEM 0.54 × 10(8) and 2.5 ± 0.56 × 10(8), respectively. The mean yield of mature macrophages cultured was also not significantly different between cirrhotic patients and controls (0.9 × 10(8) ± 0.38 × 10(8), with more than 90% viability and 0.65 × 10(8) ± 0.16 × 10(8), respectively. Maturation to macrophages resulted in up-regulation of a number of genes (MMP-9, CCL2, interleukin [IL]-10 and TNF-related weak inducer of apoptosis). A cytokine and chemokine polymerase chain reaction array, comparing the control and cirrhotic macrophages, revealed no statistically significant differences.

conclusionsMacrophages can be differentiated from cirrhotic patients' apheresis-derived CD14 monocytes and develop the same pro-resolution phenotype as control macrophages, indicating their suitability for clinical therapy.

Indexed as

AgedAnimalsCase-Control StudiesCell DifferentiationCells, CulturedChemokinesCohort StudiesCytokinesDisease Models, AnimalFemaleHumansLipopolysaccharide ReceptorsLiver CirrhosisLiver RegenerationMacrophagesMaleChemokinesCytokinesLipopolysaccharide Receptors

Identifiers

PMID26342993
PMCPMC4596388
OpenAlexW2152467259

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.