Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26342812›Full record

ArticleInternational urogynecology journal2016

Treatment of stress urinary incontinence using polyacrylamide hydrogel in women after radiotherapy: 1-year follow-up.

Jan Krhut, Alois Martan, Michaela Jurakova, David Nemec, Jaromir Masata, Peter Zvara

Abstract readControlled Clinical TrialMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International urogynecology journal, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jan KrhutDepartment of Urology, University Hospital, 17. listopadu 1790, Poruba, 708 52, Ostrava, Czech Republic. jan.krhut@fno.cz.
Alois MartanDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1st Medical Faculty, Charles University and General Faculty Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic.
Michaela JurakovaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital, Ostrava, Czech Republic.
David NemecDepartment of Urology, University Hospital, 17. listopadu 1790, Poruba, 708 52, Ostrava, Czech Republic.
Jaromir MasataDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1st Medical Faculty, Charles University and General Faculty Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic.
Peter ZvaraDepartment of Surgical Studies, Ostrava University, Ostrava, Czech Republic.
Charles University · CZUniversity Hospital Ostrava · CZUniversity of Ostrava · CZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introduction and hypothesisInformation on urethral bulking therapy in women after previous pelvic radiotherapy is lacking. This study compared the safety and efficacy of polyacrylamide intraurethral injections in patients with and without previous radiotherapy.

methodsA total of 46 patients with severe stress urinary incontinence (SUI) were enrolled in this multicenter prospective trial. Group A consisted of 24 patients with previous radiotherapy to the pelvis for the treatment of a gynaecological malignancy. Group B consisted of 22 patients without previous radiotherapy. All patients were treated with a transurethral injection of a bulking solution (Bulkamid). The average follow-up was 12.4 months. The paired Wilcoxon test was used to compare the results before and after the procedure within the groups, and the two-sample Wilcoxon test was used for comparisons between groups.

resultsComplete continence was achieved in 25 % of patients in group A and in 36.4 % of patients in group B. Significantly reduced urine leakage was observed in both groups (p = 0.0164 in group A and p = 0.0002 in group B). The total scores in the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire decreased by 5.2 in group A (p = 0.0000) and 6.36 in group B (p = 0.0001). The scores for the Total Patient Perception of Bladder Condition decreased by 1.54 in group A (p = 0.0001) and 2.59 in group B (p = 0.0000), with a significant difference between groups (p = 0.0224). No clinically significant changes in urodynamic parameters were observed. No severe adverse events were noted.

conclusionsBased on our results, we conclude that urethral bulking therapy is a valuable treatment option in patients with severe SUI who have undergone pelvic radiotherapy for the treatment of gynaecological malignancy.

Indexed as

Acrylic ResinsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBiocompatible MaterialsFemaleGenital Neoplasms, FemaleHumansHydrogelsMiddle AgedPolyacrylamidesProspective StudiesSurveys and QuestionnairesTreatment OutcomeUrinary Incontinence, StressAcrylic ResinsBiocompatible MaterialsBulkamidHydrogelsPolyacrylamidesPelvic radiotherapyPolyacrylamide hydrogelStress urinary incontinenceUrethral bulking

Identifiers

PMID26342812
OpenAlexW1255521706

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.