ArticlePlanta2016
High-throughput sequencing and degradome analysis reveal neutral evolution of Cercis gigantea microRNAs and their targets.
Article in Planta, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Target prediction of potential candidate miRNAs from Oryza sativa to silence the Pyricularia oryzae genome in rice blast.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Identification and Profiling of MicroRNAs During Embryogenesis in the Red Claw CrayfishFrontiers in physiology · 2020Article
- Analysis of miRNAs and their target genes in five Melilotus albus NILs with different coumarin content.Scientific reports · 2018Article
- Article
- miRNAs in the alga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii are not phylogenetically conserved and play a limited role in responses to nutrient deprivation.Scientific reports · 2017Article
- Identification of Arbuscular Mycorrhiza (AM)-Responsive microRNAs in Tomato.Frontiers in plant science · 2016Article
- Genome-wide identification and functional analysis of lincRNAs acting as miRNA targets or decoys in maize.BMC genomics · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
MAIN
conclusionHigh-throughput sequencing and degradome analysis for Cercis gigantea identified 194 known miRNAs and 23 novel miRNAs with 61 targets. The comparison results of highly conserved miRNAs and non-conserved miRNAs implied that C. gigantea miRNAs were subjected to the neutral evolution. MicroRNAs play a key role in post-transcriptionally regulating gene expression during plant growth, development and other various biological processes. Although numerous miRNAs have been identified and documented, to date, there are no reports on Cercis gigantea (C. gigantea) miRNAs. In this study, C. gigantea miRNAs and their target genes were investigated by extracting RNA from young roots, tender stems, young leaves, and flower buds of C. gigantea to establish a small RNA and a degradome library to further sequence. This study identified 194 known miRNAs belonging to 52 miRNA families and 23 novel miRNAs. Among these, 158 miRNAs from 27 miRNA families were highly conserved and existed in a plurality of plants. In addition, 60 different targets for 30 known families and one target for novel miRNA were identified by high-throughput sequencing and degradome analysis in C. gigantea. The comparison results revealed that highly conserved miRNAs have higher expression levels, more family members and more targets than non-conserved miRNAs, indicating that C. gigantea miRNAs were subjected to the neutral evolution. Meanwhile, these conserved miRNAs were also found to be involved in auxin signal transduction, regulation of transcription, and other developmental processes, which will help further understanding regulatory mechanisms of C. gigantea miRNAs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.