Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26342650›Full record

Trial reportThe journal of pain2015

Age Group Comparisons of TENS Response Among Individuals With Chronic Axial Low Back Pain.

Corey B Simon, Joseph L Riley, Roger B Fillingim, Mark D Bishop, Steven Z George

Open access · bronzeAbstract readClinical TrialComparative Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in The journal of pain, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Chronic Pain in the Elderly: Mechanisms and Perspectives.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2022
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Corey B SimonDepartment of Physical Therapy, College of Public Health and Health Professions, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida; Pain Research & Intervention Center of Excellence, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida. Electronic address: coreysimon@phhp.ufl.edu.
Joseph L RileyPain Research & Intervention Center of Excellence, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida.
Roger B FillingimPain Research & Intervention Center of Excellence, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida.
Mark D BishopDepartment of Physical Therapy, College of Public Health and Health Professions, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida; Pain Research & Intervention Center of Excellence, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida.
Steven Z GeorgeDepartment of Physical Therapy, College of Public Health and Health Professions, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida; Pain Research & Intervention Center of Excellence, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida.
University of Florida Health · USUniversity of Florida · US

Funding

Using social networks to map and evaluate team science across CTSA hubsUL1TR001427 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI MITCHELL, DUANE A. · 2015 to 2024
$37.2M
University of Florida Older Americans Independence Center (OAIC)P30AG028740 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI CHRISTIAAN LEEUWENBURGH · 2007 to 2026
$22.8M
UF Clinical and Translational Science AwardUL1TR000064 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI NELSON, DAVID R · 2012 to 2014
$12.2M
Biopsychosocial Influence on Shoulder PainR01AR055899 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI GEORGE, STEVEN Z · 2008 to 2020
$5.5M
The Effects of Aging on Experimental Models of Pain Inhibition and FacilitationR01AG039659 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI RILEY, JOSEPH L · 2011 to 2016
$3.0M
UF Clinical and Translational Science AwardTL1TR000066 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI NELSON, DAVID R · 2012 to 2014
$345k
NCATS NIH HHS TL1 TR000066NCATS NIH HHS TL1TR000066NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000064NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001427NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR055899NIAMS NIH HHS R01AR055899NIA NIH HHS P30 AG028740NIA NIH HHS R01 AG039659NIA NIH HHS R01AG039659
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

unlabelledChronic low back pain (CLBP) is a highly prevalent and disabling musculoskeletal pain condition among older adults. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) is commonly used to treat CLBP, however response to TENS in older adults compared with younger adults is untested. In a dose-response study stratified by age, 60 participants with axial CLBP (20 young, 20 middle-aged, 20 older) received four 20-minute sessions of high-frequency high-intensity TENS over a 2- to 3-week period in a laboratory-controlled setting. Experimental measures of pain sensitivity (mechanical pressure pain detection threshold) and central pain excitability (phasic heat temporal summation and heat aftersensations) were assessed before and after TENS. Episodic or immediate axial CLBP relief was assessed after TENS via measures of resting pain, movement-evoked-pain, and self-reported disability. Cumulative or prolonged axial CLBP relief was assessed by comparing daily pain reports across sessions. Independent of age, individuals experienced episodic increase in the pressure pain detection threshold and reduction in aftersensation after TENS application. Similarly, all groups, on average, experienced episodic axial CLBP relief via improved resting pain, movement-evoked pain, and disability report. Under this design, no cumulative effect was observed as daily pain did not improve for any age group across the 4 sessions. However, older adults received higher TENS amplitude across all sessions to achieve TENS responses similar to those in younger adults. These findings suggest that older adults experience similar episodic axial CLBP relief to that of younger individuals after high-frequency, high-intensity TENS when higher dose parameters are used. PERSPECTIVE: This study examined age group differences in experimental and axial CLBP response to TENS, delivered under the current recommended parameters of strong, but tolerable amplitude. Older adults had comparable TENS response although at higher TENS amplitude than younger adults, which may have important mechanistic and clinical implications.

Indexed as

Transcutaneous Electric Nerve StimulationAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsChronic PainFemaleHumansLow Back PainMaleMiddle AgedPain ManagementPain MeasurementPain ThresholdPersons with DisabilitiesPressureAgeaxiallow back paintranscutaneous electrical nerve stimulation

Identifiers

PMID26342650
PMCPMC4666741
OpenAlexW1500039537

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.