GuidelineInternational journal of legal medicine2016
Padova Charter on personal injury and damage under civil-tort law : Medico-legal guidelines on methods of ascertainment and criteria of evaluation.
Guideline in International journal of legal medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Medico-legal assessment of personal damage in older people: report from a multidisciplinary consensus conference.International journal of legal medicine · 2020Pooled it
- Multivitamin Supplementation and Fertility Outcome: A Retrospective Single-Center Cohort Study and the Clinical and Medicolegal Value of Nutritional Counseling.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Temporomandibular trauma and reflections on personal evaluation.Forensic science, medicine, and pathology · 2024Article
- Liability of Health Professionals Using Sensors, Telemedicine and Artificial Intelligence for Remote Healthcare.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Negative Outcomes of Blepharoplasty and Thyroid Disorders: Is Compensation Always Due? A Case Report with a Literature Review.Diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Are There Any Differences in Road Traffic Injury Outcomes between Older and Younger Adults? Setting the Grounds for Posttraumatic Senior Personal Injury Assessment Guidelines.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- AI and professional liability assessment in healthcare. A revolution in legal medicine?Frontiers in medicine · 2023Review
- Malpractice Claims and Incident Reporting: Two Faces of the Same Coin?International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- No-Fault Compensation and Anti-COVID-19 Compulsory Vaccination: The Italian Context in a Broad View.Vaccines · 2022Article
- Trauma outcomes in nonfatal road traffic accidents: a Portuguese medico-legal approach.Forensic sciences research · 2022Article
- Tortures alleged by migrants in Italy: compatibility and other medicolegal challenges.International journal of legal medicine · 2021Article
- Proposal of a formula mouth opening reduction assessment, for forensic purposes.The Journal of forensic odonto-stomatology · 2021Article
- Necrotizing fasciitis: case series and review of the literature on clinical and medico-legal diagnostic challenges.International journal of legal medicine · 2018Review
- Methodology for the identification of vulnerable asylum seekers.International journal of legal medicine · 2017Article
- A novel methodology for the objective ascertainment of psychic and existential damage.International journal of legal medicine · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Compensation for personal damage, defined as any pecuniary or non-pecuniary loss causally related to a personal injury under civil-tort law, is strictly based on the local jurisdiction and therefore varies significantly across the world. This manuscript presents the first "International Guidelines on Medico-Legal Methods of Ascertainment and Criteria of Evaluation of Personal Injury and Damage under Civil-Tort Law". This consensus document, which includes a step-by-step illustrated explanation of flow charts articulated in eight sequential steps and a comprehensive description of the ascertainment methodology and the criteria of evaluation, has been developed by an International Working Group composed of juridical and medico-legal experts and adopted as Guidelines by the International Academy of Legal Medicine (IALM).
Indexed as
Identifiers
26342285What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.