Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26342255›Full record

ArticleMethods (San Diego, Calif.)2016

Predicting protein function and other biomedical characteristics with heterogeneous ensembles.

Sean Whalen, Om Prakash Pandey, Gaurav Pandey

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Methods (San Diego, Calif.), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. LEARNING PARSIMONIOUS ENSEMBLES FOR UNBALANCED COMPUTATIONAL GENOMICS PROBLEMS.Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing. Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing · 2017
    Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sean WhalenGladstone Institutes, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA. Electronic address: shwhalen@gmail.com.
Om Prakash PandeyIcahn Institute for Genomics and Multiscale Biology and Department of Genetics and Genomic Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA. Electronic address: omprakash.pandey@mssm.edu.
Gaurav PandeyIcahn Institute for Genomics and Multiscale Biology and Department of Genetics and Genomic Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA; Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA. Electronic address: gaurav.pandey@mssm.edu.

Funding

Boosting the Translational Impact of Scientific Competitions by Ensemble LearningR01GM114434 · NIGMS · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI PANDEY, GAURAV · 2015 to 2017
$1.3M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM114434NIGMS NIH HHS R01-GM114434
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prediction problems in biomedical sciences, including protein function prediction (PFP), are generally quite difficult. This is due in part to incomplete knowledge of the cellular phenomenon of interest, the appropriateness and data quality of the variables and measurements used for prediction, as well as a lack of consensus regarding the ideal predictor for specific problems. In such scenarios, a powerful approach to improving prediction performance is to construct heterogeneous ensemble predictors that combine the output of diverse individual predictors that capture complementary aspects of the problems and/or datasets. In this paper, we demonstrate the potential of such heterogeneous ensembles, derived from stacking and ensemble selection methods, for addressing PFP and other similar biomedical prediction problems. Deeper analysis of these results shows that the superior predictive ability of these methods, especially stacking, can be attributed to their attention to the following aspects of the ensemble learning process: (i) better balance of diversity and performance, (ii) more effective calibration of outputs and (iii) more robust incorporation of additional base predictors. Finally, to make the effective application of heterogeneous ensembles to large complex datasets (big data) feasible, we present DataSink, a distributed ensemble learning framework, and demonstrate its sound scalability using the examined datasets. DataSink is publicly available from https://github.com/shwhalen/datasink.

Indexed as

Databases, ProteinMachine LearningAlgorithmsForecastingProteinsProteinsDistributed machine learningDiversity-performance tradeoffEnsemble calibrationHeterogeneous ensemblesNested cross-validationProtein function prediction

Identifiers

PMID26342255
PMCPMC4718788

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.