Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26342218›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2015

Desiderata for computable representations of electronic health records-driven phenotype algorithms.

Huan Mo, William K Thompson, Luke V Rasmussen, Jennifer A Pacheco, Guoqian Jiang, Richard Kiefer, Qian Zhu, Jie Xu, Enid Montague, David S Carrell and 19 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05277116 (The Electronic Medical Records and GEnomics), which is not on this map. Cited by 89 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
89citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05277116 naactive not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

The Electronic Medical Records and GEnomics (eMERGE) Network Genomic Risk Assessment

TypeinterventionalSponsorVanderbilt University Medical CenterRan2022 to 2030Enrolled26,877ConditionsGenetic DiseaseArmsGenome Informed Risk Assessment (GIRA) report
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

89 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Early prediction of Alzheimer's disease and related dementias using real-world electronic health records.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. Article

29 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

29 authors.

Huan MoDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.
William K ThompsonCenter for Biomedical Research Informatics, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, IL, USA.
Luke V RasmussenDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.
Jennifer A PachecoCenter for Genetic Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.
Guoqian JiangDepartment of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Richard KieferDepartment of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Qian ZhuDepartment of Information Systems, University of Maryland, Baltimore County, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Jie XuDepartment of Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.
Enid MontagueDepartment of Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.
David S CarrellGroup Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA, USA.
Todd LingrenDivision of Biomedical Informatics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Frank D MentchCenter for Applied Genomics, the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Yizhao NiDivision of Biomedical Informatics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Firas H WehbeDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.
Peggy L PeissigMarshfield Clinic Research Foundation, Marshfield Clinic, Marshfield, WI, USA.
Gerard TrompDivision of Molecular Biology and Human Genetics, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Stellenbosch, Cape Town, South Africa.
Eric B LarsonGroup Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA, USA.
Christopher G ChuteDivision of General Internal Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Jyotishman PathakDepartment of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Joshua C DennyDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA josh.denny@vanderbilt.edu.
Peter SpeltzDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.
Abel N KhoDepartment of Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.
Gail P JarvikDepartment of Medicine (Medical Genetics), University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA Department of Genome Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Cosmin A BejanDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.
Marc S WilliamsDepartment of Genome Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Kenneth BorthwickThe Sigfried and Janet Weis Center for Research, Geisinger Health System, Danville, PA, USA.
Terrie E KitchnerMarshfield Clinic Research Foundation, Marshfield Clinic, Marshfield, WI, USA.
Dan M RodenDepartment of Medicine, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA Department of Pharmacology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.
Paul A HarrisDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.

Funding

Northwestern University Clinical and Translational Science Institute (NUCATS)UL1TR001422 · NCATS · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI D'AQUILA, RICHARD · 2015 to 2023
$56.8M
Genomic Basis of Susceptibility to COVID-19 Infection and its ComplicationsU01HG006379 · NHGRI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI Richard R. Sharp · 2011 to 2026
$16.5M
Vanderbilt Genome-Electronic Records ProjectU01HG004603 · NHGRI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI RODEN, DAN M · 2007 to 2011
$7.3M
Research Project: Sensory and Multisensory Contributions to AutismU54HD083211 · NICHD · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI DYKENS, ELISABETH MAY · 2015 to 2019
$7.1M
The Electronic Medical Records and Genomics (eMERGE) Network Phase III Coordinating Center (U01)U01HG008701 · NHGRI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI PETERSON, JOSEPH F. · 2015 to 2019
$7.1M
From GWAS to PheWAS: Scanning the EMR Phenome for Gene-disease AssociationsR01LM010685 · NLM · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI BASTARACHE, LISA · 2011 to 2022
$6.3M
National Infrastructure for Standardized and Portable EHR Phenotyping AlgorithmsR01GM105688 · NIGMS · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI LUO, YUAN, PATHAK, JYOTISHMAN · 2013 to 2020
$5.7M
eMERGE Coordinating Center - Administrative SupplementU01HG006385 · NHGRI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI HARRIS, PAUL A. · 2011 to 2014
$5.4M
VGER, the Vanderbilt Genome-Electronic Records ProjectU01HG008672 · NHGRI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI DENNY, JOSHUA C., RODEN, DAN M · 2015 to 2019
$5.1M
Development and Use of Network Infrastructure for High-Throughput GWA StudiesU01HG004610 · NHGRI · KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN OF WASHINGTON · PI LARSON, ERIC B · 2007 to 2010
$4.2M
A Personalized Genomic Medicine Pilot Program Using the NJgene eMERGE ExperienceU01HG006388 · NHGRI · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI CHISHOLM, REX L, SMITH, MAUREEN E · 2011 to 2014
$4.1M
IRIS: Incorporating Research Into SightU01HG006389 · NHGRI · ESSENTIA INSTITUTE OF RURAL HEALTH · PI MCCARTY, CATHERINE ANNE · 2011 to 2014
$4.1M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001422NHGRI NIH HHS U01 HG004599NHGRI NIH HHS U01 HG004603NHGRI NIH HHS U01 HG004608NHGRI NIH HHS U01-HG004608NHGRI NIH HHS U01 HG004609NHGRI NIH HHS U01-HG004609NHGRI NIH HHS U01 HG004610NHGRI NIH HHS U01-HG004610NHGRI NIH HHS U01 HG006375NHGRI NIH HHS U01-HG006375NHGRI NIH HHS U01 HG006378NHGRI NIH HHS U01-HG006378NHGRI NIH HHS U01 HG006379NHGRI NIH HHS U01 HG006385NHGRI NIH HHS U01-HG006385NHGRI NIH HHS U01 HG006388NHGRI NIH HHS U01-HG006388NHGRI NIH HHS U01 HG006389NHGRI NIH HHS U01-HG006389NHGRI NIH HHS U01 HG006828NHGRI NIH HHS U01 HG008672NHGRI NIH HHS U01 HG008701NHGRI NIH HHS U01-HG04599NHGRI NIH HHS U01-HG04603NHGRI NIH HHS U01-HG06379NICHD NIH HHS U54 HD083211NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM103859NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM105688NLM NIH HHS R01 LM010685NLM NIH HHS R01-LM010685
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundElectronic health records (EHRs) are increasingly used for clinical and translational research through the creation of phenotype algorithms. Currently, phenotype algorithms are most commonly represented as noncomputable descriptive documents and knowledge artifacts that detail the protocols for querying diagnoses, symptoms, procedures, medications, and/or text-driven medical concepts, and are primarily meant for human comprehension. We present desiderata for developing a computable phenotype representation model (PheRM).

methodsA team of clinicians and informaticians reviewed common features for multisite phenotype algorithms published in PheKB.org and existing phenotype representation platforms. We also evaluated well-known diagnostic criteria and clinical decision-making guidelines to encompass a broader category of algorithms.

resultsWe propose 10 desired characteristics for a flexible, computable PheRM: (1) structure clinical data into queryable forms; (2) recommend use of a common data model, but also support customization for the variability and availability of EHR data among sites; (3) support both human-readable and computable representations of phenotype algorithms; (4) implement set operations and relational algebra for modeling phenotype algorithms; (5) represent phenotype criteria with structured rules; (6) support defining temporal relations between events; (7) use standardized terminologies and ontologies, and facilitate reuse of value sets; (8) define representations for text searching and natural language processing; (9) provide interfaces for external software algorithms; and (10) maintain backward compatibility.

conclusionA computable PheRM is needed for true phenotype portability and reliability across different EHR products and healthcare systems. These desiderata are a guide to inform the establishment and evolution of EHR phenotype algorithm authoring platforms and languages.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsDiagnosis, Computer-AssistedElectronic Health RecordsHumansPhenotypecomputable representationdata modelselectronic health recordsphenotype algorithmsphenotype standardization

Identifiers

PMID26342218
PMCPMC4639716

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.