Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26342072›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology2015

Rate-dependent activation failure in isolated cardiac cells and tissue due to Na+ channel block.

Anthony Varghese, Anthony J Spindler, David Paterson, Denis Noble

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Reciprocal Modulation of IFrontiers in physiology · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Anthony VargheseLaboratory of Physiology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom anthony.varghese@uwrf.edu.
Anthony J SpindlerLaboratory of Physiology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
David PatersonLaboratory of Physiology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Denis NobleLaboratory of Physiology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
University of Oxford · GB

Funding

British Heart FoundationWellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While it is well established that class-I antiarrhythmics block cardiac sodium channels, the mechanism of action of therapeutic levels of these drugs is not well understood. Using a combination of mathematical modeling and in vitro experiments, we studied the failure of activation of action potentials in single ventricular cells and in tissue caused by Na(+) channel block. Our computations of block and unblock of sodium channels by a theoretical class-Ib antiarrhythmic agent predict differences in the concentrations required to cause activation failure in single cells as opposed to multicellular preparations. We tested and confirmed these in silico predictions with in vitro experiments on isolated guinea-pig ventricular cells and papillary muscles stimulated at various rates (2-6.67 Hz) and exposed to various concentrations (5 × 10(-6) to 500 × 10(-6) mol/l) of lidocaine. The most salient result was that whereas large doses (5 × 10(-4) mol/l or higher) of lidocaine were required to inhibit action potentials temporarily in single cells, much lower doses (5 × 10(-6) mol/l), i.e., therapeutic levels, were sufficient to have the same effect in papillary muscles: a hundredfold difference. Our experimental results and mathematical analysis indicate that the syncytial nature of cardiac tissue explains the effects of clinically relevant doses of Na(+) channel blockers.

Indexed as

Action PotentialsAnimalsAnti-Arrhythmia AgentsComputer SimulationGuinea PigsHeartHeart VentriclesIn Vitro TechniquesLidocaineModels, CardiovascularModels, TheoreticalMyocardiumMyocytes, CardiacPapillary MusclesVoltage-Gated Sodium Channel BlockersAnti-Arrhythmia AgentsLidocaineVoltage-Gated Sodium Channel Blockersactivation failureconduction blocklidocainemathematical models

Identifiers

PMID26342072
PMCPMC4666979
OpenAlexW2098658458

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.