ArticleJournal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract2015
The Barcelona Technique for Ileostomy Reversal.
Article in Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03385798 (Endo-GIA Versus Endowrist Stapler in Intracorporeal Urinary Diversion in Robotic Assisted Radical Cystectomy), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Endo-GIA Versus Endowrist Stapler in Intracorporeal Urinary Diversion in Robotic Assisted Radical Cystectomy
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparison of the EndoGIA versus the Endowrist stapler in intracorporeal urinary diversion in robotic assisted radical cystectomy (EGIAES) - a randomized multicentre trial.Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Trial
- Septic shock reduces intestinal microcirculation and anastomotic perfusion: A porcine laser speckle contrast imaging study.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2026Article
- Impact of anastomotic technique and norepinephrine on microcirculation in colorectal surgery: findings from a porcine model using laser speckle contrast imaging.Techniques in coloproctology · 2025Article
- IMMEDIATE AND LATE RESULTS OF ILEOSTOMY CLOSURE IN PATIENTS WITH FAMILIAL ADENOMATOUS POLYPOSIS UNDERGOING RESTORATIVE PROCTOCOLECTOMY BY OPEN OR LAPAROSCOPIC APPROACHES.Arquivos de gastroenterologia · 2025Article
- Laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with complete mesocolic excision and D3 lymphadenectomy using the open book approach: a video vignette.Journal of minimally invasive surgery · 2024Article
- Emergency transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) repair of a strangulated obturator hernia: A literature review and video vignette.Journal of clinical imaging science · 2024Review
- Safety and Feasibility of a Lower-Cost Stapler in Bariatric Surgery.Obesity surgery · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe Barcelona technique for bowel anastomosis is not well described in the currently available literature, but it saves steps when compared to conventional stapled anastomoses. In short, the proximal and distal ends of a resection margin are approximated, small enterotomies made, a stapler is passed into both lumens creating a common channel, and lastly, this same stapler is used to create the anastomosis and amputate the specimen. We report on this technique with ileostomy reversal in terms of cost and complications. MATERIALS AND
methodsReview of ileostomy reversals (2006-2014) by a single surgical oncologist.
resultsThirty patients had surgery using the Barcelona technique. Median age was 58 years, and median postoperative surgical stay was 3 days. The majority of patients had rectal cancer initially treated with low anterior resection and diverting loop ileostomy (80 %). One patient had a wound infection (3 %), and there were no anastomotic leaks, intra-abdominal abscesses, or strictures. This technique required fewer stapler loads saving $510 in charges per case.
conclusionsThe Barcelona technique is safe and effective for ileostomy reversal. There are reduced costs related to equipment as compared to the conventional technique and thus the use of this method can result in significant medical cost savings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
26341822What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.