Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26341822›Full record

ArticleJournal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract2015

The Barcelona Technique for Ileostomy Reversal.

Katie W Russell, Brigid P O'Holleran, Megan E Bowen, Mary C Mone, Courtney L Scaife

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03385798 (Endo-GIA Versus Endowrist Stapler in Intracorporeal Urinary Diversion in Robotic Assisted Radical Cystectomy), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03385798 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

Endo-GIA Versus Endowrist Stapler in Intracorporeal Urinary Diversion in Robotic Assisted Radical Cystectomy

TypeinterventionalSponsorJørgen Bjerggaard JensenRan2018 to 2023Enrolled90ConditionsBladder CancerArmsEndowrist, Endo-GIA
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Katie W RussellDepartment of Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Utah, 30 North 1900 East, 3B 110, Salt Lake City, UT, 84132, USA.
Brigid P O'HolleranDepartment of Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Utah, 30 North 1900 East, 3B 110, Salt Lake City, UT, 84132, USA.
Megan E BowenDepartment of Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Utah, 30 North 1900 East, 3B 110, Salt Lake City, UT, 84132, USA.
Mary C MoneDepartment of Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Utah, 30 North 1900 East, 3B 110, Salt Lake City, UT, 84132, USA.
Courtney L ScaifeDepartment of Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Utah, 30 North 1900 East, 3B 110, Salt Lake City, UT, 84132, USA. courtney.scaife@hci.utah.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe Barcelona technique for bowel anastomosis is not well described in the currently available literature, but it saves steps when compared to conventional stapled anastomoses. In short, the proximal and distal ends of a resection margin are approximated, small enterotomies made, a stapler is passed into both lumens creating a common channel, and lastly, this same stapler is used to create the anastomosis and amputate the specimen. We report on this technique with ileostomy reversal in terms of cost and complications. MATERIALS AND

methodsReview of ileostomy reversals (2006-2014) by a single surgical oncologist.

resultsThirty patients had surgery using the Barcelona technique. Median age was 58 years, and median postoperative surgical stay was 3 days. The majority of patients had rectal cancer initially treated with low anterior resection and diverting loop ileostomy (80 %). One patient had a wound infection (3 %), and there were no anastomotic leaks, intra-abdominal abscesses, or strictures. This technique required fewer stapler loads saving $510 in charges per case.

conclusionsThe Barcelona technique is safe and effective for ileostomy reversal. There are reduced costs related to equipment as compared to the conventional technique and thus the use of this method can result in significant medical cost savings.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnastomosis, SurgicalFemaleHumansIleostomyMaleMiddle AgedRectal NeoplasmsRetrospective StudiesSuture TechniquesBarcelona techniqueBarcelona technique of RavitchBowel anastomosisIleostomy reversal

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.