Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26341756›Full record

ReviewCurrent psychiatry reports2015

Schizophrenia in a Primary Care Setting.

Rose Jones, Barnaby Major, Christopher Fear

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current psychiatry reports, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. COPD and Schizophrenia.Chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases (Miami, Fla.) · 2025
    Article
  2. Collaboration across the primary and specialist care interface in Early Intervention in Psychosis services: a qualitative study.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Rose Jones2Gether Foundation NHS Trust, Stonebow Unit, Stonebow Road, Hereford, HR1 2ER, UK, Rose.Jones7@nhs.net.
Barnaby Major
Christopher Fear
Central and North West London NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent years, the focus of mental health care for people with schizophrenia has shifted from an expectation of lifelong disability to a 'recovery' approach in which patients and specialists anticipate discharge to management within primary care. Although the active symptoms of mental illness are generally well-managed with modern pharmacotherapy, primary care physicians often express concern about their lack of understanding and expertise in general management of schizophrenia. Moreover, the ability of patients to access care for their physical disorders in a timely fashion together with a higher prevalence of physical co-morbidities is likely to be responsible for the greater mortality and premature death of this already stigmatised and disadvantaged group. This paper focuses on new evidence over the past 5 years, considering the management of physical and mental health of schizophrenia patients in primary care, optimal processes and the reasons why these may not always be realised in practice.

Indexed as

Antipsychotic AgentsEarly DiagnosisHumansPrimary Health CareSchizophreniaSecondary PreventionAntipsychotic Agents

Identifiers

PMID26341756
OpenAlexW1229317950

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.