Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26341710›Full record

ArticleGynecologic oncology2015

Associations between etiologic factors and mortality after endometrial cancer diagnosis: the NRG Oncology/Gynecologic Oncology Group 210 trial.

Ashley S Felix, D Scott McMeekin, David Mutch, Joan L Walker, William T Creasman, David E Cohn, Shamshad Ali, Richard G Moore, Levi S Downs, Olga B Ioffe and 3 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Gynecologic oncology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00340808 (Integration of an Epidemiologic Questionnaire Into Gynecologic Oncology Group Trials), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00340808 completednot on this map

Integration of an Epidemiologic Questionnaire Into Gynecologic Oncology Group Trials: First Project, Protocol 210

TypeobservationalSponsorNational Cancer Institute (NCI)Ran2004 to 2020Enrolled5,492ConditionsEndometrial Cancer
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Role of miR‑181a‑5p in cancer (Review).International journal of oncology · 2023
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Ashley S FelixHormonal and Reproductive Epidemiology Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA; Cancer Prevention Fellowship Program, Division of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA. Electronic address: Felix.20@osu.edu.
D Scott McMeekinDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, OK, USA.
David MutchWashington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Joan L WalkerDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, OK, USA.
William T CreasmanDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.
David E CohnDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH, USA.
Shamshad AliNRG Oncology Statistics and Data Management Center, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY, USA.
Richard G MooreProgram in Women's Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Women and Infants Hospital/Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.
Levi S DownsGynecologic Oncology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Olga B IoffeAnatomical Pathology, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA.
Kay J ParkSurgical Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Mark E ShermanBreast and Gynecologic Cancer Research Group, Division of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, MD, USA.
Louise A BrintonHormonal and Reproductive Epidemiology Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.

Funding

NRG Oncology Network Group Operations Center - GY9 BIQSFP Reports/BudgetsU10CA180868 · NCI · NRG ONCOLOGY FOUNDATION, INC. · PI NORMAN WOLMARK · 2014 to 2026
$206.8M
Statistics CoreU10CA180822 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI Mei-Yin C Polley · 2014 to 2026
$146.4M
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY GROUP HEADQUARTERSU10CA027469 · NCI · GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY GROUP · PI DISAIA, PHILIP J. · 1985 to 2013
$132.6M
Hormone-Related CancersZIACP010126 · NCI · DIVISION OF CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY AND GENETICS · PI GIERACH, GRETCHEN · 2009 to 2025
$103.5M
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY GROUP STATISTICAL OFFICEU10CA037517 · NCI · ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE CORP · PI BLESSING, JOHN A · 1985 to 2013
$67.4M
OSU as Network Lead Academic Participating Site for the NCI NCTNU10CA180850 · NCI · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI BLUM, KRISTIE A, CHAKRAVARTI, ARNAB · 2014 to 2018
$6.8M
Intramural NIH HHS Z99 CA999999NCI NIH HHS CA 27469NCI NIH HHS CA 37517NCI NIH HHS U10 CA027469NCI NIH HHS U10 CA037517NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180822NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180850NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180868
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFew studies have analyzed relationships between risk factors for endometrial cancer, especially with regard to aggressive (non-endometrioid) histologic subtypes, and prognosis. We examined these relationships in the prospective NRG Oncology/Gynecologic Oncology Group 210 trial.

methodsPrior to surgery, participants completed a questionnaire assessing risk factors for gynecologic cancers. Pathology data were derived from clinical reports and central review. We used the Fine and Gray subdistribution hazards model to estimate subhazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for associations between etiologic factors and cause-specific subhazards in the presence of competing risks. These models were stratified by tumor subtype and adjusted for stage and socioeconomic status indicators.

resultsMedian follow-up was 60months after enrollment (range: 1day-118months). Among 4609 participants, a total of 854 deaths occurred, of which, 582 deaths were attributed to endometrial carcinoma. Among low-grade endometrioid cases, endometrial carcinoma-specific subhazards were significantly associated with age at diagnosis (HR=1.04, 95% CI=1.01-1.06 per year, P-trend) and BMI (class II obesity vs. normal BMI: HR=2.29, 95% CI=1.06-4.98, P-trend=0.01). Among high-grade endometrioid cases, endometrial carcinoma-specific subhazards were associated with age at diagnosis (HR=1.05, 95% CI=1.02-1.07 per year, P-trend<0.001). Among non-endometrioid cases, endometrial carcinoma-specific subhazards were associated with parity relative to nulliparity among serous (HR=0.55, 95% CI=0.36-0.82) and carcinosarcoma cases (HR=2.01, 95% CI=1.00-4.05). DISCUSSION: Several endometrial carcinoma risk factors are associated with prognosis, which occurs in a tumor-subtype specific context. If confirmed, these results would suggest that factors beyond histopathologic features and stage are related to prognosis. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00340808.

Indexed as

Age FactorsCarcinoma, EndometrioidEndometrial NeoplasmsFemaleHumansObesityEndometrial cancerEtiologic factorsGOGNRGPrognosis

Identifiers

PMID26341710
PMCPMC4587355

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.