Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26341708›Full record

SynthesisBMC public health2015

Meta-analysis of studies on chemical, physical and biological agents in the control of Aedes aegypti.

Estelita Pereira Lima, Marília Oliveira Fonseca Goulart, Modesto Leite Rolim Neto

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC public health, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Evidence map of strategies for preventing and controllingRevista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health · 2025
    Review
  12. [Current Status of Domestic Mosquito Control in 2022].Jugan geon-gang gwa jilbyeong · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. The greatest Dengue epidemic in Brazil: Surveillance, Prevention, and Control.Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical · 2024
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Estelita Pereira LimaUniversidade Federal do Cariri/Faculdade de Medicina do ABC, Av. Príncipe de Gales, 821 - Príncipe de Gales - Santo André / SP - CEP: 09060-650, Rua Divino Salvador, 284, CEP: 63180000, Barbalha, CE, Brazil. estelitaplima@hotmail.com.
Marília Oliveira Fonseca GoulartUniversidade Federal de Alagoas, Instituto de Química e Biotecnologia, Universidade Federal de Alagoas, Av. Lourival Melo Mota s/n, Campus Universitário, BR 104, KM 97,6, CEP: 57072900, Maceió, AL, Brazil.
Modesto Leite Rolim NetoUniversidade Federal do Cariri/Faculdade de Medicina do ABC, Av. Príncipe de Gales, 821 - Príncipe de Gales - Santo André / SP - CEP: 09060-650, Rua Divino Salvador, 284, CEP: 63180000, Barbalha, CE, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAedes aegypti is a vector of international concern because it can transmit to humans three important arboviral diseases: yellow fever, dengue and chikungunya. Epidemics that are repeated year after year in a variety of urban centers indicate that there are control failures, allowing the vector to continue expanding.

methodsTo identify the most effective vector control strategies and the factors that contributed to the success or failure of each strategy, we carried out a systematic review with meta-analysis of articles published in 12 databases, from 1974 to the month of December 2013. We evaluated the association between the use of whatever chemical substance, mechanical agent, biological or integrated actions against A. aegypti and the control of the vector, as measured by 10 indicators.

resultsWe found 2,791 articles, but after careful selection, only 26 studies remained for analysis related to control interventions implemented in 15 countries, with 5 biological, 5 chemical, 3 mechanical and 13 integrated strategies. The comparison among all of them, indicated that the control of A. aegypti is significantly associated with the type of strategy used, and that integrated interventions consist of the most effective method for controlling A. aegypti.

conclusionsThe most effective control method was the integrated approach, considering the influence of eco-bio-social determinants in the virus-vector-man epidemiological chain, and community involvement, starting with community empowerment as active agents of vector control.

Indexed as

Biological FactorsInsecticidesInsect VectorsMosquito NetsAedesAnimalsCommunity ParticipationHumansMaleMosquito ControlBiological FactorsInsecticides

Identifiers

PMID26341708
PMCPMC4559884

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.