Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26341690›Full record

ReviewDer Nervenarzt2015

[Non-invasive brain stimulation for treatment of schizophrenic psychoses].

A Hasan, T Wobrock, U Palm, W Strube, F Padberg, P Falkai, A Fallgatter, C Plewnia

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Nervenarzt, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

A HasanKlinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Klinikum der Universität München Ludwig-Maximilians Universität, Nußbaumstr. 7, 80336, München, Deutschland. alkomiet.hasan@med.uni-muenchen.de.
T WobrockZentrum für seelische Gesundheit, Kreiskliniken Darmstadt-Dieburg, Darmstadt-Dieburg, Deutschland.
U PalmKlinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Klinikum der Universität München Ludwig-Maximilians Universität, Nußbaumstr. 7, 80336, München, Deutschland.
W StrubeKlinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Klinikum der Universität München Ludwig-Maximilians Universität, Nußbaumstr. 7, 80336, München, Deutschland.
F PadbergKlinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Klinikum der Universität München Ludwig-Maximilians Universität, Nußbaumstr. 7, 80336, München, Deutschland.
P FalkaiKlinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Klinikum der Universität München Ludwig-Maximilians Universität, Nußbaumstr. 7, 80336, München, Deutschland.
A FallgatterKlinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Universitätsklinik Tübingen, Tübingen, Deutschland.
C PlewniaKlinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Universitätsklinik Tübingen, Tübingen, Deutschland.
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DEKlinik und Poliklinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie · DEUniversity of Göttingen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite many different available pharmacological and psychosocial treatment options, an optimal control of symptoms is only partly possible for most schizophrenia patients. Especially, persistent auditory hallucinations, negative symptoms and cognitive impairment are difficult to treat symptoms. Several non-invasive brain stimulation techniques are increasingly being considered as new therapeutic add on options for the management of schizophrenia, targeting these symptom domains. The technique which has been available for the longest time and that is best established in clinical care is electroconvulsive therapy (ECT). New stimulation techniques, such as repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) allow a more pathophysiological-based approach. This review article introduces various non-invasive brain stimulation techniques and discusses recent treatment studies on schizophrenia. In total, the novel brain stimulation techniques discussed here can be considered relevant add on therapeutic approaches for schizophrenia. In this context, the best evidence is available for the application of rTMS for the treatment of negative symptoms and persistent auditory hallucinations; however, negative studies have also been published for both indications. Studies using other non-invasive brain stimulation techniques showed promising results but further research is needed to establish the clinical efficacy. Based on a growing pathophysiological knowledge, non-invasive brain stimulation techniques provide new treatment perspectives for patients with schizophrenia.

Indexed as

Electroconvulsive TherapyEvidence-Based MedicineHumansSchizophreniaTranscranial Direct Current StimulationTranscranial Magnetic StimulationTreatment OutcomeElectroconvulsive therapyEvidence-based psychiatryTranscranial direct current stimulationTranscranial magnetic stimulation, repetitiveVagus nerve stimulation

Identifiers

PMID26341690
OpenAlexW1891958342

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.