Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26341660›Full record

ArticleGenetics2015

Uncovering Cryptic Asexuality in Daphnia magna by RAD Sequencing.

Nils Svendsen, Celine M O Reisser, Marinela Dukić, Virginie Thuillier, Adeline Ségard, Cathy Liautard-Haag, Dominique Fasel, Evelin Hürlimann, Thomas Lenormand, Yan Galimov and 1 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Low recombination rates in sexual species and sex-asex transitions.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2017
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Evolutionary mysteries in meiosis.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2016
    Review
  10. Article
  11. The evolution of meiotic sex and its alternatives.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2016
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 7 institutions in 3 countries.

Nils SvendsenCentre d'Ecologie Fonctionnelle et Evolutive (CEFE)-Unité Mixte de Recherche 5175, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Université de Montpellier-Université Paul-Valéry Montpellier-Ecole Pratique des Hautes Etudes (EPHE), campus CNRS, 19, 34293 Montpellier Cedex 5, France.
Celine M O ReisserCentre d'Ecologie Fonctionnelle et Evolutive (CEFE)-Unité Mixte de Recherche 5175, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Université de Montpellier-Université Paul-Valéry Montpellier-Ecole Pratique des Hautes Etudes (EPHE), campus CNRS, 19, 34293 Montpellier Cedex 5, France Ecology and Evolution, University of Fribourg, 1700 Fribourg, Switzerland.
Marinela DukićZoology Institute, Evolutionary Biology, University of Basel, 4051 Basel, Switzerland.
Virginie ThuillierEcology and Evolution, University of Fribourg, 1700 Fribourg, Switzerland.
Adeline SégardCentre d'Ecologie Fonctionnelle et Evolutive (CEFE)-Unité Mixte de Recherche 5175, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Université de Montpellier-Université Paul-Valéry Montpellier-Ecole Pratique des Hautes Etudes (EPHE), campus CNRS, 19, 34293 Montpellier Cedex 5, France.
Cathy Liautard-HaagEcology and Evolution, University of Fribourg, 1700 Fribourg, Switzerland.
Dominique FaselEcology and Evolution, University of Fribourg, 1700 Fribourg, Switzerland.
Evelin HürlimannEcology and Evolution, University of Fribourg, 1700 Fribourg, Switzerland.
Thomas LenormandCentre d'Ecologie Fonctionnelle et Evolutive (CEFE)-Unité Mixte de Recherche 5175, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Université de Montpellier-Université Paul-Valéry Montpellier-Ecole Pratique des Hautes Etudes (EPHE), campus CNRS, 19, 34293 Montpellier Cedex 5, France.
Yan GalimovKoltsov Institute of Developmental Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, 119334 Moscow, Russia.
Christoph R HaagCentre d'Ecologie Fonctionnelle et Evolutive (CEFE)-Unité Mixte de Recherche 5175, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Université de Montpellier-Université Paul-Valéry Montpellier-Ecole Pratique des Hautes Etudes (EPHE), campus CNRS, 19, 34293 Montpellier Cedex 5, France Ecology and Evolution, University of Fribourg, 1700 Fribourg, Switzerland christoph.haag@cefe.cnrs.fr.
University of Fribourg · CHCentre d'Écologie Fonctionnelle et Évolutive · FRCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRÉcole Pratique des Hautes Études · FRKoltzov Institute of Developmental Biology · RUUniversité de Montpellier · FRUniversity of Basel · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The breeding systems of many organisms are cryptic and difficult to investigate with observational data, yet they have profound effects on a species' ecology, evolution, and genome organization. Genomic approaches offer a novel, indirect way to investigate breeding systems, specifically by studying the transmission of genetic information from parents to offspring. Here we exemplify this method through an assessment of self-fertilization vs. automictic parthenogenesis in Daphnia magna. Self-fertilization reduces heterozygosity by 50% compared to the parents, but under automixis, whereby two haploid products from a single meiosis fuse, the expected heterozygosity reduction depends on whether the two meiotic products are separated during meiosis I or II (i.e., central vs. terminal fusion). Reviewing the existing literature and incorporating recombination interference, we derive an interchromosomal and an intrachromosomal prediction of how to distinguish various forms of automixis from self-fertilization using offspring heterozygosity data. We then test these predictions using RAD-sequencing data on presumed automictic diapause offspring of so-called nonmale producing strains and compare them with "self-fertilized" offspring produced by within-clone mating. The results unequivocally show that these offspring were produced by automixis, mostly, but not exclusively, through terminal fusion. However, the results also show that this conclusion was only possible owing to genome-wide heterozygosity data, with phenotypic data as well as data from microsatellite markers yielding inconclusive or even misleading results. Our study thus demonstrates how to use the power of genomic approaches for elucidating breeding systems, and it provides the first demonstration of automictic parthenogenesis in Daphnia.

Indexed as

AnimalsDaphniaFemaleHeterozygoteMaleParthenogenesisRestriction MappingSelf-FertilizationSequence Analysis, DNAautomixisbreeding systemDaphnia magnagenome-wide heterozygosityinbreedingnonmale producerstychoparthenogenesis

Identifiers

PMID26341660
PMCPMC4649641
OpenAlexW2272816619

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.