Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26341469›Full record

SynthesisExperimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.)2016

Beyond emotions: A meta-analysis of neural response within face processing system in social anxiety.

Claudio Gentili, Ioana Alina Cristea, Mike Angstadt, Heide Klumpp, Leonardo Tozzi, K Luan Phan, Pietro Pietrini

Open access · greenAbstract readMeta-AnalysisReview
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Experimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
8.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 154 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Oscillatory brain dynamics underlying affective face processing.Social cognitive and affective neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Claudio GentiliClinical Psychology Branch - Department of Surgical, Medical and Molecular Pathology and Critical Care, University of Pisa, Pisa 56126, Italy Department of General Psychology - University of Padua, Padua 35131, Italy.
Ioana Alina CristeaClinical Psychology Branch - Department of Surgical, Medical and Molecular Pathology and Critical Care, University of Pisa, Pisa 56126, Italy Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, University Babes-Bolyai, Cluj-Napoca, RO 400015, Romania.
Mike AngstadtDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, USA.
Heide KlumppDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychology, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL 60612, USA.
Leonardo TozziTrinity College, College Green, Dublin 2, Ireland.
K Luan PhanDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychology, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL 60612, USA Department Anatomy and Cell Biology and the Graduate Program in Neuroscience, Chicago, IL 60612, USA Mental Health Service Line, Jesse Brown VA Medical Center, Chicago, IL 60612, USA.
Pietro PietriniClinical Psychology Branch - Department of Surgical, Medical and Molecular Pathology and Critical Care, University of Pisa, Pisa 56126, Italy pietro.pietrini@med.unipi.it.
University of Pisa · ITBabeș-Bolyai University · ROTrinity College Dublin · IEUniversity of Chicago · USUniversity of Illinois Chicago · USUniversity of Michigan–Ann Arbor · US

Funding

Brain Mechanisms of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Social Anxiety DisorderK23MH093679 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI KLUMPP, HEIDE · 2012 to 2016
$948k
NIMH NIH HHS K23 MH093679
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patients with social anxiety disorder (SAD) experience anxiety and avoidance in face-to-face interactions. We performed a meta-analysis of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies in SAD to provide a comprehensive understanding of the neural underpinnings of face perception in this disorder. To this purpose, we adopted an innovative approach, asking authors for unpublished data. This is a common procedure for behavioral meta-analyses, which, however has never been used in neuroimaging studies. We searched Pubmed with the key words "Social Anxiety AND faces" and "Social Phobia AND faces." Then, we selected those fMRI studies for which we were able to obtain data for the comparison between SAD and healthy controls (HC) in a face perception task, either from the published papers or from the authors themselves. In this way, we obtained 23 studies (totaling 449 SAD and 424 HC individuals). We identified significant clusters in which faces evoked a higher response in SAD in bilateral amygdala, globus pallidus, superior temporal sulcus, visual cortex, and prefrontal cortex. We also found a higher activity for HC in the lingual gyrus and in the posterior cingulate. Our findings show that altered neural response to face in SAD is not limited to emotional structures but involves a complex network. These results may have implications for the understanding of SAD pathophysiology, as they suggest that a dysfunctional face perception process may bias patient person-to-person interactions.

Indexed as

Facial RecognitionAnxiety DisordersBrainHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingNeuronsPhobic DisordersRadiographyamygdalaanxietyFace perceptionfunctional magnetic resonance imagingmeta-analysissocial phobia

Identifiers

PMID26341469
PMCPMC4935439
OpenAlexW1861391479

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.