Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26341376›Full record

ArticleSchmerz (Berlin, Germany)2015

[Pain care in Austrian health care centers: Questionnaire study on the current status of Austrian pain clinics].

I-S Szilagyi, H Bornemann-Cimenti, B Messerer, M Vittinghoff, A Sandner-Kiesling

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Schmerz (Berlin, Germany), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

I-S SzilagyiUniversitätsklinik für Anästhesiologie und Intensivmedizin, Medizinische Universität Graz, LKH-Universitätsklinikum Graz, Auenbruggerplatz 29, 8036, Graz, Österreich.
H Bornemann-CimentiUniversitätsklinik für Anästhesiologie und Intensivmedizin, Medizinische Universität Graz, LKH-Universitätsklinikum Graz, Auenbruggerplatz 29, 8036, Graz, Österreich.
B MessererUniversitätsklinik für Anästhesiologie und Intensivmedizin, Medizinische Universität Graz, LKH-Universitätsklinikum Graz, Auenbruggerplatz 29, 8036, Graz, Österreich.
M VittinghoffUniversitätsklinik für Anästhesiologie und Intensivmedizin, Medizinische Universität Graz, LKH-Universitätsklinikum Graz, Auenbruggerplatz 29, 8036, Graz, Österreich.
A Sandner-KieslingUniversitätsklinik für Anästhesiologie und Intensivmedizin, Medizinische Universität Graz, LKH-Universitätsklinikum Graz, Auenbruggerplatz 29, 8036, Graz, Österreich. andreas.sandner@medunigraz.at.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPain clinics provide interdisciplinary therapy to treat chronic pain patients and to increase the return-to-work rate. In recent years and due to increased economic pressure in health care, a change in the management of pain in Austrian health care centers has been observed. For the analysis of the current situation, two surveys addressing all Austrian pain clinics were performed. MATERIALS AND

methodsIn total, 133 heads of Austrian Anesthesia Departments were interviewed online and personally. The data from the first interview were confirmed by an additional telephone survey that was performed by one anesthetist per Austrian state (n = 9).

resultsCurrently, 44 Austrian pain clinics are active. During the last 5 years, 9 pain clinics closed. Adding the current active pain clinics together, they represent a total of 17.5 full-time-operated clinics. The most common reasons for closing the pain clinics were lack of personnel (47%), lack of time resources (26%), lack of space resources (11%), and financial difficulties (11%). A reduction of >50% of operating hours during the last 3 years was reported by 9 hospitals. The reasons for not running a pain clinic were lack of personnel (36%), lack of time (25%) and department too small (16%). Estimates between actual and required clinics indicate that 49.5 full-time-operating pain clinics are lacking in Austria, resulting in 74% of the Austrian chronic pain patients not receiving interdisciplinary pain management.

conclusionOur survey confirmed the closure of 9 pain clinics during the last 5 years due to lack of personnel and time. Pain clinics appear to provide the simplest economic saving potential. This development is a major concern. Although running a pain clinic seems to be expensive at the first sight, it reduces pain, sick leave, complications, and potential legal issues against health care centers, while simultaneously increasing the hospital's competitiveness. Our results show that 74% of Austrian chronic pain patients do not have access to an interdisciplinary pain clinic. Because of plans to further economize resources, Austria may lose its ability to provide state-of-the-art pain therapy and management.

Indexed as

Interdisciplinary CommunicationPain ClinicsAustriaChronic PainHealth Care SurveysHealth Facility ClosureHealth Services AccessibilityHumansIntersectoral CollaborationPain ManagementPalliative CareSurveys and QuestionnairesAustriaChronic painCombined modality therapyHealth services researchSurvey

Identifiers

PMID26341376

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.