Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26341085›Full record

ArticleObesity surgery2015

Comparison of Reinforcement Techniques Using Suture on Staple-Line in Sleeve Gastrectomy.

Tomasz Rogula, Zhamak Khorgami, Martin Bazan, Cristina Mamolea, Pablo Acquafresca, Omar El-Shazly, Ali Aminian, Philip Schauer

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Obesity surgery, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. THE ROUTINE USE OF THE METHYLENE BLUE TEST IN SLEEVE GASTRECTOMY: WHY NOT?Arquivos brasileiros de cirurgia digestiva : ABCD = Brazilian archives of digestive surgery · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. The effect of oversewing the staple line in laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: randomized control trial.Wideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Tomasz RogulaCleveland Clinic, Bariatric and Metabolic Institute, 9500 Euclid Ave, M66-06, Cleveland, OH, 44118, USA. tomrogula@gmail.com.
Zhamak KhorgamiCleveland Clinic, Bariatric and Metabolic Institute, 9500 Euclid Ave, M66-06, Cleveland, OH, 44118, USA.
Martin BazanJagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland.
Cristina MamoleaJagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland.
Pablo AcquafrescaUniversity of Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Omar El-ShazlyUniversity of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Ali AminianCleveland Clinic, Bariatric and Metabolic Institute, 9500 Euclid Ave, M66-06, Cleveland, OH, 44118, USA.
Philip SchauerCleveland Clinic, Bariatric and Metabolic Institute, 9500 Euclid Ave, M66-06, Cleveland, OH, 44118, USA.
Cleveland Clinic · USJagiellonian University · PLAmerican Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery · USUniversity of Buenos Aires · ARUniversity of Pittsburgh Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSleeve gastrectomy is a common procedure in recent years for treatment of morbid obesity however leak from staple-line is its main challenging complication. Despite numerous studies regarding leak after sleeve gastrectomy, there is still no conclusion on reinforcement of staple-line in this procedure. The purpose of this study was to compare two methods of oversewing staple-line versus no reinforcement.

methodsResected stomachs of 30 patients undergoing laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy were evaluated for bursting pressure immediately after extraction from the abdomen. Reinforcement technique was applied in random order to 3 segments of the staple-line on each specimen: continuous Lembert's sutures, continuous through-and-through sutures, and no reinforcement. Bursting pressure was determined by injection of methylene blue solution into lumen of resected stomach and recording pressure at which leakage occurs. Location of leak, intragastric pressure, and volume at first leak were recorded.

resultsBaseline characteristics of patients were similar in randomized groups for order of reinforcement technique. Mean ischemia time of specimens was 17.4 ± 10.4 min. No leaks were observed in segments reinforced with Lembert's oversewing technique. The through-and-through reinforcement segments were first to leak in 21 out of 30 cases (70 %) with mean leak pressure of 570 mmHg and mean leak volume of 399 ml. Leakage occurred in 9 segments (30 %) with no reinforcement with a leak pressure of 329 mmHg and volume of 380 ml.

conclusionsIn vitro, Lembert's suture reinforcement technique on stapled human stomach is associated with less leakage rate in comparison to through-and-through reinforcement and non-reinforced staple-line.

Indexed as

AdultAnastomotic LeakFemaleGastrectomyHumansLaparoscopyMaleMiddle AgedObesity, MorbidStomachSurgical StaplingSuture TechniquesBurst pressureSleeve gastrectomyStaple-line leakStaple-line reinforcement

Identifiers

PMID26341085
OpenAlexW1268450748

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.