Trial reportClinical oral investigations2016
Effects of pH and fluoride concentration of dentifrices on fluoride levels in saliva, biofilm, and biofilm fluid in vivo.
Trial report in Clinical oral investigations, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Intraoral fluoride retention after using experimental toothpaste containing titanium tetrafluoride and chitosan.Clinical oral investigations · 2026Trial
- A randomized triple-blind crossover trial of a hydrocolloid-containing dentifrice as a controlled-release system for fluoride.Clinical oral investigations · 2018Trial
- Fluoride and calcium concentrations in the biofilm fluid after use of fluoridated dentifrices supplemented with polyphosphate salts.Clinical oral investigations · 2017Trial
- Optical, Mechanical, and Chemical Impact of Brushing with Activated Charcoal Toothpowder and Toothpaste on Dental Enamel: An In Vitro Evaluation.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- The influence of biofilm maturation on fluoride's anticaries efficacy.Clinical oral investigations · 2022Article
- Influence of salivary conditioning and sucrose concentration on biofilm-mediated enamel demineralization.Journal of applied oral science : revista FOB · 2020Article
- Effects of dentifrices differing in fluoride compounds on artificial enamel caries lesions in vitro.Odontology · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionAcidic dentifrices have been shown to be more effective than neutral ones against dental caries using in vitro, in situ, and clinical protocols.
objectivesGiven the scarcity of studies assessing intraoral fluoride (F) retention after using such formulations, the present study evaluated the influence of pH and F concentration of dentifrices on F uptake by saliva, biofilm, and biofilm fluid.
methodsVolunteers (n = 22) were randomly assigned to dentifrices containing 0 (placebo), 550 (LFD, low-fluoride dentifrice), and 1100 ppm F (CD, conventional dentifrice) at pH 4.5 and 7.0 and brushed their teeth 3 times/day following a double-blind, crossover protocol. Saliva and biofilm samples were collected after 7 days of using the dentifrices, 1 and approximately 12 h after last brushing. F and calcium (Ca) analyses were performed with the inverted electrode after buffering with TISAB III and the Arsenazo III method, respectively. Data were analyzed by 3-way ANOVA, Tukey's HSD test, and Pearson's correlation coefficient (p < 0.05).
resultsF concentrations in biofilm fluid and whole biofilm 1 h after brushing with acidic F-toothpastes were higher than those related to neutral counterparts, although the differences were small and not significant; no increases were observed in salivary F concentrations influenced by dentifrice pH. Moreover, no definite trend was observed for Ca concentrations in these compartments.
conclusionDentifrice pH had some influence on F uptake by the biofilm fluid, having lesser or no impact on F uptake by the biofilm and saliva, respectively. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Toothbrushing with acidic toothpastes leads to slight increases in F concentrations in the biofilm fluid when compared to neutral formulations, which may contribute to the higher anticaries effect of acidic formulations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.