Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26340941›Full record

Trial reportBMC emergency medicine2015

Cross-checking to reduce adverse events resulting from medical errors in the emergency department: study protocol of the CHARMED cluster randomized study.

Yonathan Freund, Alexandra Rousseau, Laurence Berard, Helene Goulet, Patrick Ray, Benjamin Bloom, Tabassome Simon, Bruno Riou

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC emergency medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02356926 (Cross Checking to Reduce Adverse Events Resulting From Medical Errors in the Emergency Department), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02356926 completednot on this mapstarted 2016, after this paper: background citation

Cross Checking to Reduce Adverse Events Resulting From Medical Errors in the Emergency Department

TypeobservationalSponsorAssistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisRan2016 to 2017Enrolled1,680ConditionsEmergency Patients
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Yonathan FreundParis Sorbonne Université, UPMC univ-Paris 6, Paris, France. yonatman@gmail.com.
Alexandra RousseauAPHP, GH HUEP, Hôpital St Antoine, Plateforme de recherche Clinique de l'est Parisien (URCEST-CRCEST), Paris, France. alexandra.rousseau@sat.aphp.fr.
Laurence BerardAPHP, GH HUEP, Hôpital St Antoine, Plateforme de recherche Clinique de l'est Parisien (URCEST-CRCEST), Paris, France. laurence.berard@sat.aphp.fr.
Helene GouletEmergency Department, Hopital Pitie-Salpetriere, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (APHP), Paris, France. helen.goulet@gmail.com.
Patrick RayParis Sorbonne Université, UPMC univ-Paris 6, Paris, France. patrick.ray@tnn.aphp.fr.
Benjamin BloomEmergency Department, Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK. ben.bloom@nhs.net.
Tabassome SimonParis Sorbonne Université, UPMC univ-Paris 6, Paris, France. tabassome.simon@sat.aphp.fr.
Bruno RiouParis Sorbonne Université, UPMC univ-Paris 6, Paris, France. bruno.riou@psl.aphp.fr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMedical errors and preventable adverse events are a major cause of concern, especially in the emergency department (ED) where its prevalence has been reported to be roughly of 5-10% of visits. Due to a short length of stay, emergency patients are often managed by a sole physician - in contrast with other specialties where they can benefit from multiples handover, ward rounds and staff meetings. As some studies report that the rate and severity of errors may decrease when there is more than one physician involved in the management in different settings, we sought to assess the impact of regular systematic cross-checkings between physicians in the ED.

designThe CHARMED (Cross-checking to reduce adverse events resulting from medical errors in the emergency department) study is a multicenter cluster randomized study that aim to evaluate the reduction of the rate of severe medical errors with implementation of systematic cross checkings between emergency physician, compared to a control period with usual care. This study will evaluate the effect of this intervention on the rate of severe medical errors (i.e. preventable adverse events or near miss) using a previously described two-level chart abstraction. We made the hypothesis that implementing frequent and systematic cross checking will reduce the rate of severe medical errors from 10 to 6% - 1584 patients will be included, 140 for each period in each center. DISCUSSION: The CHARMED study will be the largest study that analyse unselected ED charts for medical errors. This could provide evidence that frequent systematic cross-checking will reduce the incidence of severe medical errors.

trial registrationClinical Trials, NCT02356926.

Indexed as

Patient SafetyClinical ProtocolsCross-Over StudiesEmergency Service, HospitalFeasibility StudiesHumansMedical ErrorsModels, Statistical

Identifiers

PMID26340941
PMCPMC4560890

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.