Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26340887›Full record

Trial reportTrials2015

Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial: tongue strengthening exercises in head and neck cancer patients, does exercise load matter?

Gwen Van Nuffelen, Leen Van den Steen, Olivier Vanderveken, Pol Specenier, Carl Van Laer, Diane Van Rompaey, Cindy Guns, Steven Mariën, Marc Peeters, Paul Van de Heyning and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Trials, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Feasibility of tongue strength measurements during (chemo)radiotherapy in head and neck cancer patients.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2017
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Gwen Van NuffelenDepartment of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery - Rehabilitation Center for Communication Disorders, Antwerp University Hospital, Antwerp, Belgium. Gwen.van.nuffelen@uza.be.
Leen Van den SteenDepartment of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery - Rehabilitation Center for Communication Disorders, Antwerp University Hospital, Antwerp, Belgium. Leen.VandenSteen@uza.be.
Olivier VandervekenDepartment of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery - Rehabilitation Center for Communication Disorders, Antwerp University Hospital, Antwerp, Belgium. Olivier.vanderveken@uza.be.
Pol SpecenierDepartment Medical Oncology, Antwerp University Hospital, Antwerp, Belgium. Pol.specenier@uza.be.
Carl Van LaerDepartment of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery - Rehabilitation Center for Communication Disorders, Antwerp University Hospital, Antwerp, Belgium. Carl.Vanlaer@uza.be.
Diane Van RompaeyDepartment of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery - Rehabilitation Center for Communication Disorders, Antwerp University Hospital, Antwerp, Belgium. Diane.Vanrompaey@uza.be.
Cindy GunsDepartment of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery - Rehabilitation Center for Communication Disorders, Antwerp University Hospital, Antwerp, Belgium. Cindy.Guns@uza.be.
Steven MariënDepartment of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery - Rehabilitation Center for Communication Disorders, Antwerp University Hospital, Antwerp, Belgium. Steven.marien@uza.be.
Marc PeetersFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium. Marc.Peeters@uza.be.
Paul Van de HeyningDepartment of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery - Rehabilitation Center for Communication Disorders, Antwerp University Hospital, Antwerp, Belgium. Paul.van.de.heyning@uza.be.
Jan VanderwegenUniversity College Thomas More, Antwerp, Belgium. janvanderwegen@telenet.be.
Marc De BodtDepartment of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery - Rehabilitation Center for Communication Disorders, Antwerp University Hospital, Antwerp, Belgium. Marc.de.bodt@uza.be.
Antwerp University Hospital · BEUniversity of Antwerp · BEThomas More University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundReduced tongue strength is an important factor contributing to early and late dysphagia in head and neck cancer patients previously treated with chemoradiotherapy. The evidence is growing that tongue strengthening exercises can improve tongue strength and swallowing function in both healthy and dysphagic subjects. However, little is known about the impact of specific features of an exercise protocol for tongue strength on the actual outcome (strength or swallowing function). Previous research originating in the fields of sports medicine and physical rehabilitation shows that the degree of exercise load is an influential factor for increasing muscle strength in the limb skeletal muscles. Since the tongue is considered a muscular hydrostat, it remains to be proven whether the same concepts will apply. METHODS/

designThis ongoing randomized controlled trial in chemoradiotherapy-treated patients with head and neck cancer investigates the effect of three tongue strengthening exercise protocols, with different degrees of exercise load, on tongue strength and swallowing. At enrollment, 51 patients whose dysphagia is primarily related to reduced tongue strength are randomly assigned to a training schedule of 60, 80, or 100% of their maximal tongue strength. Patients are treated three times a week for 8 weeks, executing 120 repetitions of the assigned exercise once per training day. Exercise load is progressively adjusted every 2 weeks. Patients are evaluated before, during and after treatment by means of tongue strength measurements, fiber-optic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing and quality-of-life questionnaires. DISCUSSION: This randomized controlled trial is the first to systematically investigate the effect of different exercise loads in tongue strengthening exercise protocols. The results will allow the development of more efficacious protocols.

trial registrationCurrent Controlled Trials ISRCTN14447678.

Indexed as

Muscle StrengthBelgiumChemoradiotherapyClinical ProtocolsDeglutitionDeglutition DisordersExercise TherapyFiber Optic TechnologyHead and Neck NeoplasmsHumansLaryngoscopyRecovery of FunctionResearch DesignRisk FactorsSurveys and QuestionnairesTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID26340887
PMCPMC4560920
OpenAlexW1920887135

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.