ArticlePloS one2015
Aspects of Dynamic Balance Responses: Inter- and Intra-Day Reliability.
Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Devices and tasks involved in the objective assessment of standing dynamic balancing - A systematic literature review.PloS one · 2017Pooled it
- Learning effects during balance analysis on a modified posturomed-platform in healthy dogs.BMC veterinary research · 2026Article
- Balance Assessment on a Modified Posturomed Platform in Healthy Dogs.Veterinary sciences · 2024Article
- Validity and Reliability of Dynamic and Functional Balance Tests in People Aged 19-54: A Systematic Review.International journal of sports physical therapy · 2024Article
- Article
- Blood Flow Restricted Cycling Impairs Subsequent Jumping But Not Balance Performance Slightly More Than Non-Restricted Cycling: An Acute Randomized Controlled Cross-Over Trial.Journal of sports science & medicine · 2023Article
- Center of pressure displacement due to graded controlled perturbations to the trunk in standing subjects: the force-impulse paradigm.European journal of applied physiology · 2022Article
- Similar strength gains at lower perceived efforts via cluster set vs. traditional home-based online training: A 6 weeks randomized controlled trial.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2022Article
- Reliability of a novel dynamic test of postural stability in high-level soccer players.Heliyon · 2021Article
- Article
- Linearity and repeatability of postural responses in relation to peak force and impulse of manually delivered perturbations: a preliminary study.European journal of applied physiology · 2020Article
- Agility Training to Integratively Promote Neuromuscular, Cognitive, Cardiovascular and Psychosocial Function in Healthy Older Adults: A Study Protocol of a One-Year Randomized-Controlled Trial.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020Article
- Sensor-based systems for early detection of dementia (SENDA): a study protocol for a prospective cohort sequential study.BMC neurology · 2020Article
- Validity and Reliability of a Novel Integrative Motor Performance Testing Course for Seniors: The "Agility Challenge for the Elderly (ACE)".Frontiers in physiology · 2019Article
- Constant performance in balance and proprioception tests across the menstrual cycle - a pilot study in well trained female ice hockey players on hormonal contraception.Health science reports · 2018Article
- Effects of hypothermically reduced plantar skin inputs on anticipatory and compensatory balance responses.BMC neuroscience · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Posturomed device is used as a scientific tool to quantify human dynamic balance ability due to unexpected perturbations, and as a training device. Consequently, the question arises whether such measurements are compromised by learning effects. Therefore, this study aimed to analyze inter- and intra-day reliability of dynamic balance responses using the Posturomed. Thirty healthy young subjects participated (24.3±3.2 years). The Posturomed was equipped with a triggering mechanism to enable unexpected, horizontal platform perturbations. A force platform was used to quantify Center of Pressure (COP) excursions for two time intervals: interval 1 (0-70 ms post perturbation) and interval 2 (71-260 ms post perturbation). Dynamic balance tests were performed in single leg stances in medio-lateral and anterior-posterior perturbation directions. Inter- and intra-day reliability were assessed descriptively using Bland-Altman plots and inferentially using tests for systematic error and intra-class-correlations. With regard to the mean COP excursions for every subject and all intervals, some cases revealed significant differences between measurement sessions, however, none were considered relevant. Furthermore, intra class correlation coefficients reflected high magnitudes, which leads to the assumption of good relative reliability. However, analyzing inter- and intra-day reliability using Bland-Altman plots revealed one exception: intra-day comparisons for the anterior-posterior direction in interval 2, which points towards possible learning effects. In summary, results reflected good overall reliability with the exception of certain intra-day comparisons in the anterior-posterior perturbation direction, which could indicate learning effects in those particular conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.