Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26340291›Full record

ArticleJournal of occupational and environmental medicine2015

Validation of a New Metric for Assessing the Integration of Health Protection and Health Promotion in a Sample of Small- and Medium-Sized Employer Groups.

Jessica A R Williams, Candace C Nelson, Alberto J Cabán-Martinez, Jeffrey N Katz, Gregory R Wagner, Nicolaas P Pronk, Glorian Sorensen, Deborah L McLellan

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of occupational and environmental medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Total Worker Health: A Small Business Leader Perspective.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2018
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Cross-cultural adaptation of Dimensions of Corporate Safety Scorecard to the Brazilian Portuguese language.Revista brasileira de medicina do trabalho : publicacao oficial da Associacao Nacional de Medicina do Trabalho-ANAMT · 2018
    Article
  6. Cross-cultural adaptation of Dimensions of Corporate Well-Being Scorecard to the Brazilian Portuguese language.Revista brasileira de medicina do trabalho : publicacao oficial da Associacao Nacional de Medicina do Trabalho-ANAMT · 2018
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jessica A R WilliamsDana-Farber Cancer Institute (Drs Williams, Nelson, Sorensen, and McLellen); Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health (Drs Williams, Nelson, Cabán-Martinez, Katz, Wagner, Pronk, Sorensen, and McLellan), Boston, Mass; University of Miami Medical School (Dr Cabán-Martinez), Fla; HealthPartners, Inc (Dr Pronk), Minneapolis, Minn; Brigham and Women's Hospital (Dr Katz), Boston, Mass; and National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (Dr. Wagner), Washington, DC.
Candace C Nelson
Alberto J Cabán-Martinez
Jeffrey N Katz
Gregory R Wagner
Nicolaas P Pronk
Glorian Sorensen
Deborah L McLellan

Funding

The Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health Center for Work, Health and WellbeingU19OH008861 · OH · HARVARD UNIVERSITY D/B/A HARVARD SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH · PI SORENSEN, GLORIAN C · 2007 to 2025
$23.9M
ACL HHS U19OH008861NIOSH CDC HHS U19 OH008861
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo conduct validation analyses for a new measure of the integration of worksite health protection and health promotion approaches developed in earlier research.

methodsA survey of small- to medium-sized employers located in the United States was conducted between October 2013 and March 2014 (n = 111). Cronbach α coefficient was used to assess reliability, and Pearson correlation coefficients were used to assess convergent validity.

resultsThe integration score was positively associated with the measures of occupational safety and health and health promotion activities/policies-supporting its convergent validity (Pearson correlation coefficients of 0.32 to 0.47). Cronbach α coefficient was 0.94, indicating excellent reliability.

conclusionsThe integration score seems to be a promising tool for assessing integration of health promotion and health protection. Further work is needed to test its dimensionality and validate its use in other samples.

Indexed as

Health PromotionOccupational HealthPrivate SectorHumansPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesSystems IntegrationUnited StatesWorkplace

Identifiers

PMID26340291
PMCPMC5189678

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.