Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26340060›Full record

ArticleBioFactors (Oxford, England)

Ascorbic acid efflux from human brain microvascular pericytes: role of re-uptake.

James M May, Zhi-Chao Qu

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BioFactors (Oxford, England). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

James M MayDepartment of Medicine, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN.
Zhi-Chao QuDepartment of Medicine, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN.
Vanderbilt University · US

Funding

Vanderbilt Diabetes Research CenterP30DK020593 · NIDDK · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI OWEN P MCGUINNESS · 2012 to 2026
$29.3M
TRANSGENIC MOUSE/ ES CELL SHARES RESOURCESP60DK020593 · NIDDK · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI MCGUINNESS, OWEN P · 1986 to 2011
$28.1M
ASCORBIC ACID FUNCTION AND METABOLISMR01DK050435 · NIDDK · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI MAY, JAMES M. · 1995 to 2015
$4.0M
NIDDK NIH HHS DK020593NIDDK NIH HHS DK050435NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK020593NIDDK NIH HHS P60 DK020593NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK050435
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microvascular pericytes take up ascorbic acid on the ascorbate transporter SVCT2. Intracellular ascorbate then protects the cells against apoptosis induced by culture at diabetic glucose concentrations. To investigate whether pericytes might also provide ascorbate to the underlying endothelial cells, we studied ascorbate efflux from human pericytes. When loaded with ascorbate to intracellular concentrations of 0.8-1.0 mM, almost two-thirds of intracellular ascorbate effluxed from the cells over 2 H. This efflux was opposed by ascorbate re-uptake from the medium, since preventing re-uptake by destroying extracellular ascorbate with ascorbate oxidase increased ascorbate loss even further. Ascorbate re-uptake occurred on the SVCT2, since its blockade by replacing medium sodium with choline, by the SVCT2 inhibitor sulfinpyrazone, or by extracellular ascorbate accelerated ascorbate loss from the cells. This was supported by finding that net efflux of radiolabeled ascorbate was increased by unlabeled extracellular ascorbate with a half-maximal effect in the range of the high affinity Km of the SVCT2. Intracellular ascorbate did not inhibit its efflux. To assess the mechanism of ascorbate efflux, known inhibitors of volume-regulated anion channels (VRACs) were tested. These potently inhibited ascorbate transport into cells on the SVCT2, but not its efflux. An exception was the anion transport inhibitor DIDS, which, despite inhibition of ascorbate uptake, also inhibited net efflux at 25-50 µM. These results suggest that ascorbate efflux from vascular pericytes occurs on a DIDS-inhibitable transporter or channel different from VRACs. Further, ascorbate efflux is opposed by re-uptake of ascorbate on the SVCT2, providing a potential regulatory mechanism.

Indexed as

Ascorbic AcidBrainCells, CulturedHumansPericytesSodium-Coupled Vitamin C TransportersAscorbic AcidSodium-Coupled Vitamin C Transportersascorbate effluxascorbic acidpericytesSVCT2voltage-regulated anion channels

Identifiers

PMID26340060
PMCPMC4624047
OpenAlexW2106675442

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.