ArticleThe journal of physical chemistry. B2015
Toward Automated Benchmarking of Atomistic Force Fields: Neat Liquid Densities and Static Dielectric Constants from the ThermoML Data Archive.
Article in The journal of physical chemistry. B, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Efficient Multistate Free-Energy Calculations with QM/MM Accuracy Using Replica-Exchange Enveloping Distribution Sampling.The journal of physical chemistry. B · 2025Article
- A Fast, Convenient, Polarizable Electrostatic Model for Molecular Dynamics.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2024Article
- Regularized by Physics: Graph Neural Network Parametrized Potentials for the Description of Intermolecular Interactions.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2023Article
- Development and Benchmarking of Open Force Field v1.0.0-the Parsley Small-Molecule Force Field.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2021Article
- Keyphrase Extraction for Technical Language Processing.Journal of research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology · 2021Article
- A deep learning approach for the blind logP prediction in SAMPL6 challenge.Journal of computer-aided molecular design · 2020Article
- Infinite Dilution Activity Coefficients as Constraints for Force Field Parametrization and Method Development.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2019Article
- Escaping Atom Types in Force Fields Using Direct Chemical Perception.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2018Article
- Blinded predictions of distribution coefficients in the SAMPL5 challenge.Journal of computer-aided molecular design · 2016Article
- Calculating Partition Coefficients of Small Molecules in Octanol/Water and Cyclohexane/Water.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Atomistic molecular simulations are a powerful way to make quantitative predictions, but the accuracy of these predictions depends entirely on the quality of the force field employed. Although experimental measurements of fundamental physical properties offer a straightforward approach for evaluating force field quality, the bulk of this information has been tied up in formats that are not machine-readable. Compiling benchmark data sets of physical properties from non-machine-readable sources requires substantial human effort and is prone to the accumulation of human errors, hindering the development of reproducible benchmarks of force-field accuracy. Here, we examine the feasibility of benchmarking atomistic force fields against the NIST ThermoML data archive of physicochemical measurements, which aggregates thousands of experimental measurements in a portable, machine-readable, self-annotating IUPAC-standard format. As a proof of concept, we present a detailed benchmark of the generalized Amber small-molecule force field (GAFF) using the AM1-BCC charge model against experimental measurements (specifically, bulk liquid densities and static dielectric constants at ambient pressure) automatically extracted from the archive and discuss the extent of data available for use in larger scale (or continuously performed) benchmarks. The results of even this limited initial benchmark highlight a general problem with fixed-charge force fields in the representation low-dielectric environments, such as those seen in binding cavities or biological membranes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.