Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26339835›Full record

SynthesisThe European journal of general practice2015

A safety incident reporting system for primary care. A systematic literature review and consensus procedure by the LINNEAUS collaboration on patient safety in primary care.

Kerstin Klemp, Dorien Zwart, Jørgen Hansen, Torben Hellebek, Dagmar Luettel, Wim Verstappen, Martin Beyer, Ferdin M Gerlach, Barbara Hoffmann, Aneez Esmail

Open access · hybridAbstract readConsensus StatementSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The European journal of general practice, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Patient Safety: A Deep Concern to Caregivers.Innovations in pharmacy · 2019
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Kerstin Klempa Goethe University Frankfurt am Main, Institute of General Practice , Frankfurt am Main , Germany.
Dorien Zwart
Jørgen Hansen
Torben Hellebek
Dagmar Luettel
Wim Verstappen
Martin Beyer
Ferdin M Gerlach
Barbara Hoffmann
Aneez Esmail
Goethe University Frankfurt · DEDanish College of General Practitioners · DKManchester Academic Health Science Centre · GBNational Patient Safety Agency · GBRadboud University Medical Center · NLUniversity Medical Center Utrecht · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIncident reporting is widely used in both patient safety improvement programmes, and in research on patient safety.

objectiveTo identify the key requirements for incident reporting systems in primary care; to develop an Internet-based incident reporting and learning system for primary care.

methodsA literature review looking at the purpose, design and requirements of an incident reporting system (IRS) was used to update an existing incident reporting system, widely used in Germany. Then, an international expert panel with knowledge on IRS developed the criteria for the design of a new web-based incident reporting system for European primary care. A small demonstration project was used to create a web-based reporting system, to be made freely available for practitioners and researchers. The expert group compiled recommendations regarding the desirable features of an incident reporting system for European primary care. These features covered the purpose of reporting, who should be involved in reporting, the mode of reporting, design considerations, feedback mechanisms and preconditions necessary for the implementation of an IRS.

resultsA freely available web-based reporting form was developed, based on these criteria. It can be modified for local contexts. Practitioners and researchers can use this system as a means of recording patient safety incidents in their locality and use it as a basis for learning from errors.

conclusionThe LINNEAUS collaboration has provided a freely available incident reporting system that can be modified for a local context and used throughout Europe.

Indexed as

Medical ErrorsPatient SafetyPrimary Health CareConsensusHumansRisk ManagementIncident-reporting systemLINNEAUS collaborationpatient safetyprimary care

Identifiers

PMID26339835
PMCPMC4828618
OpenAlexW1796453496

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.