Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26339830›Full record

ReviewThe European journal of general practice2015

Improving medication safety in primary care. A review and consensus procedure by the LINNEAUS collaboration on patient safety in primary care.

Miriam Lainer, Anna Vögele, Michel Wensing, Andreas Sönnichsen

Abstract readConsensus StatementReview
In one paragraph

Review in The European journal of general practice, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Ambulatory Medication Safety in Primary Care: A Systematic Review.Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine : JABFM
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Pharmacy Education Needs to Address Diagnostic Safety.American journal of pharmaceutical education · 2019
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Miriam Lainera Paracelsus Medical University, Institute of General Practice, Family Medicine and Preventive Medicine , Salzburg , Austria.
Anna Vögele
Michel Wensing
Andreas Sönnichsen

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDrug treatment is an important clinical process in primary care that is associated with risk of error and adverse events.

objectiveTo review currently available research evidence on the topic and to develop a framework, which can help to guide improvement of medication safety.

methodsSystematic reviews were performed on adverse drug events (ADE), their preventability, and on available tools and methods to improve medication safety with a particular focus on information technology. Consensus methods were used to develop a framework to guide the improvement of medication safety based on the findings of our literature review.

resultsThe median prevalence rate of ADEs in primary care patients was 12.8%. Only a median of 16.5% of ADEs were preventable and thus could be classified as medication errors. Our review of information technology interventions found that only about half of the studies found a reduction of medication errors. In both reviews, the wide range between studies emphasizes the necessity of a validated medication error classification system. Another important aspect of medication safety appears to be a general lack of safety culture in primary care, which led us to the development of the Salzburg medication safety framework (SaMSaF), based on the MaPSaF tool to improve patient safety. The tool proved to be feasible and useful in a pilot study with several GP practices.

conclusionA number of tools and interventions to investigate and enhance medication safety have been identified. Further research is necessary to implement and evaluate current concepts.

Indexed as

Primary Health CareQuality ImprovementConsensusHumansMedication Errorsadverse drug eventsLINNEAUS collaborationliterature reviewMedication safetypatient safetyprimary care

Identifiers

PMID26339830
PMCPMC4828608

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.