Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26339678›Full record

ArticleAnnals of clinical and translational neurology2015

Acute seizure suppression by transcranial direct current stimulation in rats.

Sameer C Dhamne, Dana Ekstein, Zhihong Zhuo, Roman Gersner, David Zurakowski, Tobias Loddenkemper, Alvaro Pascual-Leone, Frances E Jensen, Alexander Rotenberg

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of clinical and translational neurology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Transcranial Magnetic and Direct Current Stimulation in Children.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2017
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Animal models of transcranial direct current stimulation: Methods and mechanisms.Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2016
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Sameer C DhamneNeuromodulation Program, Division of Epilepsy and Clinical Neurophysiology, and the F.M. Kirby Neurobiology Center, Department of Neurology, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Dana EksteinDepartment of Neurology, The Agnes Ginges Center of Human Neurogenetics, Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center Jerusalem, Israel.
Zhihong ZhuoNeuromodulation Program, Division of Epilepsy and Clinical Neurophysiology, and the F.M. Kirby Neurobiology Center, Department of Neurology, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School Boston, Massachusetts, USA ; Department of Pediatric Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University Zhengzhou, China.
Roman GersnerNeuromodulation Program, Division of Epilepsy and Clinical Neurophysiology, and the F.M. Kirby Neurobiology Center, Department of Neurology, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
David ZurakowskiDepartment of Anesthesia, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Tobias LoddenkemperNeuromodulation Program, Division of Epilepsy and Clinical Neurophysiology, and the F.M. Kirby Neurobiology Center, Department of Neurology, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Alvaro Pascual-LeoneBerenson-Allen Center for Noninvasive Brain Stimulation, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Frances E JensenDepartment of Neurology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania Health System Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Alexander RotenbergNeuromodulation Program, Division of Epilepsy and Clinical Neurophysiology, and the F.M. Kirby Neurobiology Center, Department of Neurology, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School Boston, Massachusetts, USA ; Department of Pediatric Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University Zhengzhou, China ; Berenson-Allen Center for Noninvasive Brain Stimulation, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Boston Children's Hospital · USHarvard University · USBerenson Allen Center for Noninvasive Brain Stimulation · USFirst Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University · CNHadassah Medical Center · ILUniversity of Pennsylvania Health System · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveCathodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a focal neuromodulation technique that suppresses cortical excitability by low-amplitude constant electrical current, and may have an antiepileptic effect. Yet, tDCS has not been tested in status epilepticus (SE). Furthermore, a combined tDCS and pharmacotherapy antiseizure approach is unexplored. We therefore examined in the rat pentylenetetrazol (PTZ) SE model whether cathodal tDCS (1) suppresses seizures, (2) augments lorazepam (LZP) efficacy, and (3) enhances GABAergic cortical inhibition.

methodsExperiment 1 aimed to identify an effective cathodal tDCS intensity. Rats received intraperitoneal PTZ followed by tDCS (sham, cathodal 1 mA, or cathodal 0.1 mA; for 20 min), and then a second PTZ challenge. In Experiment 2, two additional animal groups received a subtherapeutic LZP dose after PTZ, and then verum or sham tDCS. Clinical and electroencephalography (EEG) epileptic activity were compared between all groups. In Experiment 3, we measured GABA-mediated paired-pulse inhibition of the motor evoked potential by paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (ppTMS) in rats that received PTZ or saline, and either verum or sham tDCS.

resultsCathodal 1 mA tDCS (1) reduced EEG spike bursts, and suppressed clinical seizures after the second PTZ challenge, (2) in combination with LZP was more effective in seizure suppression and improved the clinical seizure outcomes compared to either tDCS or LZP alone, and (3) prevented the loss of ppTMS motor cortex inhibition that accompanied PTZ injection.

interpretationThese results suggest that cathodal 1 mA tDCS alone and in combination with LZP can suppress seizures by augmenting GABAergic cortical inhibition.

Identifiers

PMID26339678
PMCPMC4554445
OpenAlexW2162719654

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.