Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26339389›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of clinical and experimental pathology2015

Expression of p16 and pRB in invasive breast cancer.

Eunah Shin, Woo-Hee Jung, Ja-Seung Koo

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of clinical and experimental pathology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Relevance of pRB Loss in Human Malignancies.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2022
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Night Shift Work, DNA Methylation and Telomere Length: An Investigation on Hospital Female Nurses.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019
    Article
  19. Prognostic impact of high p16/cyclin D1 index in breast cancer.International journal of clinical and experimental pathology · 2019
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Eunah ShinDepartment of Pathology, CHA Gangnam Medical Center, CHA University Seoul, South Korea.
Woo-Hee JungDepartment of Pathology, Yonsei University College of Medicine Seoul, South Korea.
Ja-Seung KooDepartment of Pathology, Yonsei University College of Medicine Seoul, South Korea.
Yonsei University · KRCHA University Gangnam Medical Center · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We aimed to assess protein expressions of p16 and pRB in breast cancer and explore the clinicopathologic implications. Tissue microarray (TMA) was constructed with 406 cases of breast cancer. The cases were subgrouped into luminal A, luminal B, HER-2, and triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) based on the results of immunohistochemical stains for ER, PR, HER-2, and Ki-67 and fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) for HER-2. One hundred and sixty-eight cases were allocated to the subgroup luminal A; 87 cases to the luminal B; 32 cases to the HER-2; and 119 cases to the TNBC. The TNBC group showed the highest negative rate for p16, and the luminal B and HER-2 groups showed the highest positive rate for p16 (P < 0.001). Alteration of p16 was the highest in the luminal B and HER-2 groups, and pRB expression rate was the highest in the HER-2 group and lowest in the luminal A group. In addition, p16(+)/pRB(+) type was the most common in the luminal B group, p16(+)/pRB(-) in the luminal A group, and p16(-)/pRB(+) in the TNBC group (P < 0.001). Altered p16/pRB(+) and non-altered p16/pRB(+) type was the most common in the luminal B, and altered p16/pRB(-) and non-altered p16/pRB(+) type was the most common in the luminal A (P < 0.001). Alteration of p16 was correlated with higher Ki67 labeling index (LI) (P = 0.013), and p16 negativity was correlated with ER negativity (P = 0.002), PR negativity (P = 0.004), and higher Ki67 LI (P < 0.001). pRB positivity was correlated with PR negativity (P = 0.009), HER-2 positivity (P = 0.001), and higher Ki-67 LI (P < 0.001). In luminal group A, p16 alteration was correlated with shorter DFS in univariate analysis (P = 0.024). In conclusion, Expression rates of p16 and pRB differ according to the molecular subgroups of breast cancer and they subsequently correlate with clnicopathologic factors.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorBreast NeoplasmsCyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p16Disease-Free SurvivalErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesFemaleHumansImmunohistochemistryIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescenceKaplan-Meier EstimateMiddle AgedNeoplasm InvasivenessProportional Hazards ModelsReceptors, EstrogenReceptors, ProgesteroneRetinoblastoma ProteinBiomarkers, TumorCyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p16ERBB2 protein, humanErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesReceptors, EstrogenReceptors, ProgesteroneRetinoblastoma ProteinBreast cancerp16RB

Identifiers

PMID26339389
PMCPMC4555717
OpenAlexW2415722538

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.