Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26339387›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of clinical and experimental pathology2015

SOX-2, but not Oct4, is highly expressed in early-stage endometrial adenocarcinoma and is related to tumour grading.

Kazimierz Pityński, Tomasz Banas, Milosz Pietrus, Katarzyna Milian-Ciesielska, Artur Ludwin, Krzysztof Okon

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of clinical and experimental pathology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Cancer biology & medicine · 2019
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Primary cultures of human colon cancer as a model to study cancer stem cells.Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kazimierz PityńskiDepartment of Gynecology and Oncology, Jagiellonian University, Chair of Gynecology and Obstetrics Krakow, Poland.
Tomasz BanasDepartment of Gynecology and Oncology, Jagiellonian University, Chair of Gynecology and Obstetrics Krakow, Poland.
Milosz PietrusDepartment of Gynecology and Oncology, Jagiellonian University, Chair of Gynecology and Obstetrics Krakow, Poland.
Katarzyna Milian-CiesielskaDepartment of Pathomorphology, Jagiellonian University Krakow, Poland.
Artur LudwinDepartment of Gynecology and Oncology, Jagiellonian University, Chair of Gynecology and Obstetrics Krakow, Poland.
Krzysztof OkonDepartment of Pathomorphology, Jagiellonian University Krakow, Poland.
Jagiellonian University · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundExpression of SOX-2 and Oct4 as markers for the identification of cancer stem cells (CSCs) has been revealed in several malignancies. In this study, the co-expression of SOX-2 and Oct4 and their correlation with clinicopathological features of endometrial adenocarcinomas (EACs) was investigated.

methodsSOX-2 and Oct4 expression was assessed by immunohistochemistry in 27 (39.13%) stage IA and in 42 (60.87%) stage IB International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) EACs and related to the clinicopathological features of patients.

resultsThe expression of SOX-2 was confirmed in 62/69 tumour specimens compared to Oct4 expression in 46/69 specimens (P = 0.015) and no difference in median staining intensity between SOX-2 and Oct-4 was observed. The highest median SOX-2 expression was found in high-grade (G3) EAC samples compared to moderate-grade (G2) EAC specimens (P = 0.020) and low-grade (G1) specimens (P = 0.008), while no differences in median Oct4 expression in EAC samples according to grading were present. In G3 specimens, significantly higher median SOX-2 expression was noted compared to Oct4 (P = 0.002). SOX-2 and Oct4 co-expression was observed only in G1 EAC (R: 0.51; P = 0.031). Age of EAC diagnosis was positively correlated with SOX-2 expression (b = 0.193; R(2) = 10.83%; P = 0.003) but not to age of menarche, menopause, parity or body mass index.

conclusionsThere is no need to use SOX-2 expression as a poor outcome predictor in stage I EAC, and SOX-2 expression should be analysed in more advanced stages.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaAgedBiomarkers, TumorEndometrial NeoplasmsFemaleHumansImmunohistochemistryMiddle AgedNeoplasm GradingNeoplasm StagingOctamer Transcription Factor-3Predictive Value of TestsSOXB1 Transcription FactorsBiomarkers, TumorOctamer Transcription Factor-3POU5F1 protein, humanSOX2 protein, humanSOXB1 Transcription FactorsCancer stem cellsendometrial adenocarcinomaimmunohistochemistryOct4SOX-2

Identifiers

PMID26339387
PMCPMC4555715
OpenAlexW1465474996

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.