Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26339355›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of clinical and experimental pathology2015

Genetic polymorphisms in nucleotide excision repair pathway influences response to chemotherapy and overall survival in osteosarcoma.

Yongjian Sun, Yi Wu, Weicheng Li, Zhen Kong, Xiaoming Zou

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of clinical and experimental pathology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Review
  6. Cancers · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. International journal of molecular epidemiology and genetics · 2018
    Article
  11. Association between common polymorphisms inOncoTargets and therapy · 2018
    Article
  12. Review
  13. The pharmacogenomics of osteosarcoma.The pharmacogenomics journal · 2017
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yongjian SunDepartment of Traum Orthopedics, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Southern Medical University Guangzhou, China.
Yi WuDepartment of Traum Orthopedics, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Southern Medical University Guangzhou, China.
Weicheng LiDepartment of Traum Orthopedics, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Southern Medical University Guangzhou, China.
Zhen KongDepartment of Traum Orthopedics, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Southern Medical University Guangzhou, China.
Xiaoming ZouDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Southern Medical University Guangzhou, China.
Third Affiliated Hospital of Southern Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We analyzed the role of genetic polymorphisms of six important NER pathway genes in response to chemotherapy and clinical outcome of osteosarcoma patients. A prospective study including 172 osteosarcoma patients was conducted between January 2009 and January 2011. The polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP) was used for ERCC1 rs11615 and rs2298881, ERCC2 rs13181 and rs1799793, ERCC4 rs1800067, ERCC5 rs1047768, XPA 1800975, and XPC rs2228000 and rs2228001 gene polymorphisms. By logistic regression analysis, TT genotype of ERCC1 rs11615 genetic polymorphism was significant correlated with poor response to chemotherapy when compared with wide-type genotype (OR=0.27, 95% CI=0.10-0.71). AC and CC genotype of ERCC1 rs2298881 were significantly associated with poor response to chemotherapy when compared with AA genotype (For AC genotype, OR=0.45, 95% CI=0.21-0.97; for CC genotype, OR=0.19, 95% CI=0.06-0.58). By Cox proportional hazards regression analysis, TT genotype of ERCC1 rs11615 and CC genotype of ERCC1 rs2298881 suffered a 3.16 and 3.57-fold increased hazards of death (For ERCC1 rs11615, HR=3.16, 95% CI=1.19-9.16; for ERCC1 rs2298881, HR=3.57, 95% CI=1.10-11.35). In conclusion, our findings suggest that ERCC1 rs11615 and ERCC1 rs2298881 genetic polymorphisms are significantly associated with poor response to chemotherapy and unfavourable survival of osteosarcoma.

Indexed as

Polymorphism, Single NucleotideAdolescentAdultAntineoplastic AgentsBone NeoplasmsChi-Square DistributionDisease-Free SurvivalDisease ProgressionDNA-Binding ProteinsDNA RepairEndonucleasesFemaleGene FrequencyHeterozygoteHomozygoteHumansAntineoplastic AgentsDNA-Binding ProteinsEndonucleasesERCC1 protein, humanNER pathwayosteosarcomaoverall survivalresponse to chemotherapy

Identifiers

PMID26339355
PMCPMC4555683
OpenAlexW1428497523

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.