ArticleBiomicrofluidics2015
Three-dimensional printed millifluidic devices for zebrafish embryo tests.
Article in Biomicrofluidics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 68 citations in OpenAlex.
- Towards a 3D-Printed Millifluidic Device for Investigating Cellular Processes.Micromachines · 2024Article
- Unlocking the potential of 3D printed microfluidics for mass spectrometry analysis using liquid infused surfaces.Analytica chimica acta · 2023Article
- A millifluidic chip for cultivation of fish embryos and toxicity testing fabricated by 3D printing technology.RSC advances · 2021Article
- Class II biocompatible E-Shell 300 3D printing material causes severe developmental toxicity inRSC advances · 2021Article
- Can 3D Printing Bring Droplet Microfluidics to Every Lab?-A Systematic Review.Micromachines · 2021Review
- Three-Dimensional Printed Devices in Droplet Microfluidics.Micromachines · 2019Review
- Antimicrobial Polymers for Additive Manufacturing.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019Review
- Characterization of 3D-Printed Moulds for Soft Lithography of Millifluidic Devices.Micromachines · 2018Article
- 3D-Printed Chips: Compatibility of Additive Manufacturing Photopolymeric Substrata with Biological Applications.Micromachines · 2018Review
- A 3D-printed microbial cell culture platform withBiomicrofluidics · 2017Article
- Moving from millifluidic to truly microfluidic sub-100-μm cross-section 3D printed devices.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2017Article
- 3D Printing of Organs-On-Chips.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2017Review
- A Laminar Flow-Based Microfluidic Tesla Pump via Lithography Enabled 3D Printing.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2016Article
- 3D printed auto-mixing chip enables rapid smartphone diagnosis of anemia.Biomicrofluidics · 2016Article
- 3D printed microfluidic mixer for point-of-care diagnosis of anemia.Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference · 2016Article
- A Role for 3D Printing in Kidney-on-a-Chip Platforms.Current transplantation reports · 2016Article
- 3D printed microfluidic circuitry via multijet-based additive manufacturing.Lab on a chip · 2016Article
- Assessment of biocompatibility of 3D printed photopolymers using zebrafish embryo toxicity assays.Lab on a chip · 2016Article
- Assessment of the biocompatibility of three-dimensional-printed polymers using multispecies toxicity tests.Biomicrofluidics · 2015Article
- Predicting the behavior of microfluidic circuits made from discrete elements.Scientific reports · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Implementations of Lab-on-a-Chip technologies for in-situ analysis of small model organisms and embryos (both invertebrate and vertebrate) are attracting an increasing interest. A significant hurdle to widespread applications of microfluidic and millifluidic devices for in-situ analysis of small model organisms is the access to expensive clean room facilities and complex microfabrication technologies. Furthermore, these resources require significant investments and engineering know-how. For example, poly(dimethylsiloxane) soft lithography is still largely unattainable to the gross majority of biomedical laboratories willing to pursue development of chip-based platforms. They often turn instead to readily available but inferior classical solutions. We refer to this phenomenon as workshop-to-bench gap of bioengineering science. To tackle the above issues, we examined the capabilities of commercially available Multi-Jet Modelling (MJM) and Stereolithography (SLA) systems for low volume fabrication of optical-grade millifluidic devices designed for culture and biotests performed on millimetre-sized specimens such as zebrafish embryos. The selected 3D printing technologies spanned a range from affordable personal desktop systems to high-end professional printers. The main motivation of our work was to pave the way for off-the-shelf and user-friendly 3D printing methods in order to rapidly and inexpensively build optical-grade millifluidic devices for customized studies on small model organisms. Compared with other rapid prototyping technologies such as soft lithography and infrared laser micromachining in poly(methyl methacrylate), we demonstrate that selected SLA technologies can achieve user-friendly and rapid production of prototypes, superior feature reproduction quality, and comparable levels of optical transparency. A caution need to be, however, exercised as majority of tested SLA and MJM resins were found toxic and caused significant developmental abnormalities in zebrafish embryos. Taken together, our data demonstrate that SLA technologies can be used for rapid and accurate production of devices for biomedical research. However, polymer biotoxicity needs to be carefully evaluated.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.