Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26339275›Full record

ArticleJournal of physics. Conference series

Overview of Risk Management for Engineered Nanomaterials.

P A Schulte, C L Geraci, L L Hodson, R D Zumwalde, E D Kuempel, V Murashov, K F Martinez, D S Heidel

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of physics. Conference series. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Effect of fullerenol nanoparticles on oxidative stress induced by paraquat in honey bees.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2020
    Article
  2. An Exploratory Assessment of Applying Risk Management Practices to Engineered Nanomaterials.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Opportunities and challenges of nanotechnology in the green economy.Environmental health : a global access science source · 2014
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

P A SchulteNational Institute for Occupational Safety and Heath, 4676 Columbia Parkway, MS-C14, Cincinnati, OH 45226.
C L GeraciNational Institute for Occupational Safety and Heath, 4676 Columbia Parkway, MS-C14, Cincinnati, OH 45226.
L L HodsonNational Institute for Occupational Safety and Heath, 4676 Columbia Parkway, MS-C14, Cincinnati, OH 45226.
R D ZumwaldeNational Institute for Occupational Safety and Heath, 4676 Columbia Parkway, MS-C14, Cincinnati, OH 45226.
E D KuempelNational Institute for Occupational Safety and Heath, 4676 Columbia Parkway, MS-C14, Cincinnati, OH 45226.
V MurashovNational Institute for Occupational Safety and Heath, 4676 Columbia Parkway, MS-C14, Cincinnati, OH 45226.
K F MartinezNational Institute for Occupational Safety and Heath, 4676 Columbia Parkway, MS-C14, Cincinnati, OH 45226.
D S HeidelNational Institute for Occupational Safety and Heath, 4676 Columbia Parkway, MS-C14, Cincinnati, OH 45226.
National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health · US

Funding

Intramural CDC HHS CC999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Occupational exposure to engineered nanomaterials (ENMs) is considered a new and challenging occurrence. Preliminary information from laboratory studies indicates that workers exposed to some kinds of ENMs could be at risk of adverse health effects. To protect the nanomaterial workforce, a precautionary risk management approach is warranted and given the newness of ENMs and emergence of nanotechnology, a naturalistic view of risk management is useful. Employers have the primary responsibility for providing a safe and healthy workplace. This is achieved by identifying and managing risks which include recognition of hazards, assessing exposures, characterizing actual risk, and implementing measures to control those risks. Following traditional risk management models for nanomaterials is challenging because of uncertainties about the nature of hazards, issues in exposure assessment, questions about appropriate control methods, and lack of occupational exposure limits (OELs) or nano-specific regulations. In the absence of OELs specific for nanomaterials, a precautionary approach has been recommended in many countries. The precautionary approach entails minimizing exposures by using engineering controls and personal protective equipment (PPE). Generally, risk management utilizes the hierarchy of controls. Ideally, risk management for nanomaterials should be part of an enterprise-wide risk management program or system and this should include both risk control and a medical surveillance program that assesses the frequency of adverse effects among groups of workers exposed to nanomaterials. In some cases, the medical surveillance could include medical screening of individual workers to detect early signs of work-related illnesses. All medical surveillance should be used to assess the effectiveness of risk management; however, medical surveillance should be considered as a second line of defense to ensure that implemented risk management practices are effective.

Identifiers

PMID26339275
PMCPMC4556602
OpenAlexW2153391906

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.