Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26339224›Full record

ReviewGerman medical science : GMS e-journal2015

Use of a German longitudinal prescription database (LRx) in pharmacoepidemiology.

Hartmut Richter, Silvia Dombrowski, Hajo Hamer, Peyman Hadji, Karel Kostev

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative StudyReview
In one paragraph

Review in German medical science : GMS e-journal, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Hartmut RichterIMS Health, Real World Evidence Solutions, Frankfurt, Germany.
Silvia DombrowskiIMS Health, Real World Evidence Solutions, Frankfurt, Germany.
Hajo HamerDepartment of Neurology, Epilepsy Center, University of Erlangen, Germany.
Peyman HadjiDepartment of Women's Health, North West Hospital, Frankfurt, Germany.
Karel KostevFresenius University of Applied Sciences, Idstein, Germany.
Hochschule Fresenius · DEUniversity Hospital Frankfurt · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Large epidemiological databases are often used to examine matters pertaining to drug utilization, health services, and drug safety. The major strength of such databases is that they include large sample sizes, which allow precise estimates to be made. The IMS® LRx database has in recent years been used as a data source for epidemiological research. The aim of this paper is to review a number of recent studies published with the aid of this database and compare these with the results of similar studies using independent data published in the literature. In spite of being somewhat limited to studies for which comparative independent results were available, it was possible to include a wide range of possible uses of the LRx database in a variety of therapeutic fields: prevalence/incidence rate determination (diabetes, epilepsy), persistence analyses (diabetes, osteoporosis), use of comedication (diabetes), drug utilization (G-CSF market) and treatment costs (diabetes, G-CSF market). In general, the results of the LRx studies were found to be clearly in line with previously published reports. In some cases, noticeable discrepancies between the LRx results and the literature data were found (e.g. prevalence in epilepsy, persistence in osteoporosis) and these were discussed and possible reasons presented. Overall, it was concluded that the IMS® LRx database forms a suitable database for pharmacoepidemiological studies.

Indexed as

Databases, FactualAnticonvulsantsDiabetes MellitusDrug PrescriptionsEpilepsyGermanyGranulocyte Colony-Stimulating FactorHumansHypoglycemic AgentsIncidenceInsulinInsulin Infusion SystemsOsteoporosisPharmacoepidemiologyPrevalenceAnticonvulsantsGranulocyte Colony-Stimulating FactorHypoglycemic AgentsInsulindatabaseepidemiologyLRx

Identifiers

PMID26339224
PMCPMC4549652
OpenAlexW1241156931

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.