Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26339087›Full record

ArticleGhana medical journal2015

Rhesus Negative Woman Transfused With Rhesus Positive Blood: Subsequent Normal Pregnancy Without Anti D production.

E T Maya, K A Buntugu, F Pobee, E K Srofenyoh

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ghana medical journal, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 93% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

E T MayaSchool Of Public Health, University Of Ghana, Accra, Ghana.
K A BuntuguDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Ridge Regional Hospital, Accra, Ghana.
F PobeeDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Ridge Regional Hospital, Accra, Ghana.
E K SrofenyohDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Ridge Regional Hospital, Accra, Ghana.
University of Ghana · GH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clinicians sometimes are confronted with the challenge of transfusing haemorrhaging Rhesus (Rh) D negative patients with Rh D positive blood to save their lives. There are concerns about alloimmunization and future haemolytic disease of the newborn in women of the reproductive age. Another fear is transfusion reaction if they receive another Rh D positive blood in future. We present a 32-year-old Rh D negative woman, who had postpartum haemorrhage in her first pregnancy and was transfused with Rh D positive blood because of unavailability of Rh D negative blood. She did not receive anti D immunoglobin but subsequently had a normal term pregnancy of an Rh positive fetus without any detectable anti D antibodies throughout the pregnancy. In life threatening situations from obstetric haemorrhage, transfusion of Rh D negative women with Rh D positive blood should be considered as the last resort.

Indexed as

AdultBlood TransfusionFemaleHumansImmunologic FactorsInfant, NewbornPregnancyPregnancy Complications, HematologicRh-Hr Blood-Group SystemRh IsoimmunizationRho(D) Immune GlobulinImmunologic FactorsRh-Hr Blood-Group SystemRHO(D) antibodyRho(D) Immune Globulinalloimmunizationanti D immunoglobulinblood transfusionpregnancyRhesus negative

Identifiers

PMID26339087
PMCPMC4549809
OpenAlexW2128966712

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.