Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26339068›Full record

ReviewClinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN2016

The Native Kidney Biopsy: Update and Evidence for Best Practice.

Jonathan J Hogan, Michaela Mocanu, Jeffrey S Berns

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 158 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
158citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

158 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Kidney biopsy guidebook 2020 in Japan.Clinical and experimental nephrology · 2021
    Guideline
  5. Transjugular Renal Biopsy Bleeding Risk and Diagnostic Yield: A Systematic Review.Journal of vascular and interventional radiology : JVIR · 2020
    Pooled it
  6. Guideline
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Kidney Elastography in Adult Nephrology: A Narrative Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Observational
  17. Performing a percutaneous kidney biopsy.World journal of nephrology · 2026
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

98 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jonathan J HoganDepartment of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania jonathan.hogan2@uphs.upenn.edu.
Michaela MocanuDepartment of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Jeffrey S BernsDepartment of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The kidney biopsy is the gold standard in the diagnosis and management of many diseases. Since its introduction in the 1950s, advancements have been made in biopsy technique to improve diagnostic yield while minimizing complications. Here, we review kidney biopsy indications, techniques, and complications in the modern era. We also discuss patient populations in whom special consideration must be given when considering a kidney biopsy and the important role that the kidney biopsy plays in nephrology training. These data are presented to develop best practice strategies for this essential procedure.

Indexed as

BenchmarkingBiopsyClinical CompetenceEvidence-Based MedicineHumansKidneyKidney DiseasesPractice Guidelines as TopicPredictive Value of TestsPrognosisRisk FactorsSeverity of Illness Indexbiopsydisease managementglomerular diseasehumanskidneykidney biopsykidney diseasenephrectomynephrology

Identifiers

PMID26339068
PMCPMC4741037

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.