Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26339031›Full record

ArticleScience (New York, N.Y.)2015

Structures of archaeal DNA segregation machinery reveal bacterial and eukaryotic linkages.

Maria A Schumacher, Nam K Tonthat, Jeehyun Lee, Fernando A Rodriguez-Castañeda, Naga Babu Chinnam, Anne K Kalliomaa-Sanford, Irene W Ng, Madhuri T Barge, Porsha L R Shaw, Daniela Barillà

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Science (New York, N.Y.), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Self-organization ofScience (New York, N.Y.) · 2019
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. SbnI is a free serine kinase that generatesThe Journal of biological chemistry · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Maria A SchumacherDepartment of Biochemistry, Duke University School of Medicine, 243 Nanaline H. Duke, Box 3711, Durham, NC 27710, USA. maria.schumacher@duke.edu daniela.barilla@york.ac.uk.
Nam K TonthatDepartment of Biochemistry, Duke University School of Medicine, 243 Nanaline H. Duke, Box 3711, Durham, NC 27710, USA.
Jeehyun LeeDepartment of Biochemistry, Duke University School of Medicine, 243 Nanaline H. Duke, Box 3711, Durham, NC 27710, USA.
Fernando A Rodriguez-CastañedaDepartment of Biology, University of York, York YO10 5DD, UK.
Naga Babu ChinnamDepartment of Biochemistry, Duke University School of Medicine, 243 Nanaline H. Duke, Box 3711, Durham, NC 27710, USA.
Anne K Kalliomaa-SanfordDepartment of Biology, University of York, York YO10 5DD, UK.
Irene W NgDepartment of Biology, University of York, York YO10 5DD, UK.
Madhuri T BargeDepartment of Biology, University of York, York YO10 5DD, UK.
Porsha L R ShawDepartment of Biochemistry, Duke University School of Medicine, 243 Nanaline H. Duke, Box 3711, Durham, NC 27710, USA.
Daniela BarillàDepartment of Biology, University of York, York YO10 5DD, UK. maria.schumacher@duke.edu daniela.barilla@york.ac.uk.

Funding

MINOS (Macromolecular Insights on Nucleic acids Optimized by Scattering)R01GM105404 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIF-LAWRENC BERKELEY LAB · PI TAINER, JOHN A. · 2012 to 2015
$2.1M
Assembly and partition mechanism of Walker-box based segregation machineryR01GM115563 · NIGMS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI SCHUMACHER, MARIA · 2015 to 2018
$1.2M
Structural studies on the P1 plasmid partition apparatus.R01GM074815 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI SCHUMACHER, MARIA · 2006 to 2009
$720k
Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/F012004/1NIGMS NIH HHS GM074815NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM074815NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM105404NIGMS NIH HHS R01-GM105404NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM115563
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although recent studies have provided a wealth of information about archaeal biology, nothing is known about the molecular basis of DNA segregation in these organisms. Here, we unveil the machinery and assembly mechanism of the archaeal Sulfolobus pNOB8 partition system. This system uses three proteins: ParA; an atypical ParB adaptor; and a centromere-binding component, AspA. AspA utilizes a spreading mechanism to create a DNA superhelix onto which ParB assembles. This supercomplex links to the ParA motor, which contains a bacteria-like Walker motif. The C domain of ParB harbors structural similarity to CenpA, which dictates eukaryotic segregation. Thus, this archaeal system combines bacteria-like and eukarya-like components, which suggests the possible conservation of DNA segregation principles across the three domains of life.

Indexed as

Chromosome SegregationAmino Acid MotifsArchaeal ProteinsAutoantigensBacteriaCentromereCentromere Protein AChromosomal Proteins, Non-HistoneChromosomes, ArchaealDNA, ArchaealDNA, SuperhelicalKluyveromycesNucleic Acid ConformationProtein Structure, TertiarySulfolobusArchaeal ProteinsAutoantigensCentromere Protein AChromosomal Proteins, Non-HistoneDNA, ArchaealDNA, Superhelical

Identifiers

PMID26339031
PMCPMC4844061

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.