Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26338787›Full record

ArticleClinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America2016

Risk Factors for Invasive Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Infection After Recent Discharge From an Acute-Care Hospitalization, 2011-2013.

Lauren Epstein, Yi Mu, Ruth Belflower, Janine Scott, Susan Ray, Ghinwa Dumyati, Christina Felsen, Susan Petit, Kimberly Yousey-Hindes, Joelle Nadle and 8 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Risk factors for drug-resistant pathogens in community-acquired pneumonia: systematic review and meta-analysis.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Factors Associated with Methicillin-ResistantAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Potentiation of β-Lactams against Methicillin-ResistantAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Targeted gown and glove use to preventInfection control and hospital epidemiology · 2021
    Article
  9. Airborne Staphylococcus aureus in different environments-a review.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2019
    Review
  10. Overview of methicillin resistantOrthopedic reviews · 2019
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Lauren EpsteinDivision of Healthcare Quality Promotion Epidemic Intelligence Service, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Yi MuDivision of Healthcare Quality Promotion.
Ruth BelflowerDivision of Healthcare Quality Promotion.
Janine ScottGeorgia Emerging Infections Program, Decatur.
Susan RayEmory University School of Medicine, Atlanta Georgia Emerging Infections Program, Decatur.
Ghinwa DumyatiUniversity of Rochester Medical Center, New York.
Christina FelsenUniversity of Rochester Medical Center, New York.
Susan PetitConnecticut Department of Public Health, Hartford.
Kimberly Yousey-HindesConnecticut Emerging Infections Program, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven.
Joelle NadleCalifornia Emerging Infections Program, Oakland.
Lauren PasuttiCalifornia Emerging Infections Program, Oakland.
Ruth LynfieldMinnesota Department of Health, St Paul.
Linn WarnkeMinnesota Department of Health, St Paul.
William SchaffnerVanderbilt University School of Medicine Tennessee Emerging Infections Program, Nashville.
Karen LeibVanderbilt University School of Medicine Tennessee Emerging Infections Program, Nashville.
Alexander J KallenDivision of Healthcare Quality Promotion.
Scott K FridkinDivision of Healthcare Quality Promotion.
Fernanda C LessaDivision of Healthcare Quality Promotion.
Adventist HealthCare Rehabilitation · USIbis Reproductive Health · USMinnesota Department of Health · USUniversity of Rochester Medical Center · USVanderbilt University · USConnecticut Department of Public Health · USEmory University · USEpidemic Intelligence Service · US

Funding

Intramural CDC HHS CC999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSignificant progress has been made in reducing methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections among hospitalized patients. However, the decreases in invasive MRSA infections among recently discharged patients have been less substantial. To inform prevention strategies, we assessed risk factors for invasive MRSA infection after acute-care hospitalizations.

methodsWe conducted a prospective, matched case-control study. A case was defined as MRSA cultured from a normally sterile body site in a patient discharged from a hospital within the prior 12 weeks. Eligible case patients were identified from 15 hospitals across 6 US states. For each case patient, 2 controls were matched for hospital, month of discharge, and age group. Medical record reviews and telephone interviews were performed. Conditional logistic regression was used to identify independent risk factors for postdischarge invasive MRSA.

resultsFrom 1 February 2011 through 31 March 2013, 194 case patients and 388 matched controls were enrolled. The median time between hospital discharge and positive culture was 23 days (range, 1-83 days). Factors independently associated with postdischarge MRSA infection included MRSA colonization (matched odds ratio [mOR], 7.71; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.60-16.51), discharge to a nursing home (mOR, 2.65; 95% CI, 1.41-4.99), presence of a chronic wound during the postdischarge period (mOR, 4.41; 95% CI, 2.14-9.09), and discharge with a central venous catheter (mOR, 2.16; 95% CI, 1.13-4.99) or a different invasive device (mOR, 3.03; 95% CI, 1.24-7.39) in place.

conclusionsPrevention efforts should target patients with MRSA colonization or those with invasive devices or chronic wounds at hospital discharge. In addition, MRSA prevention efforts in nursing homes are warranted.

Indexed as

Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureusBacteremiaCase-Control StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient DischargeProspective StudiesRisk FactorsStaphylococcal Infectionsbacteremiaepidemiologymethicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureusrisk-factors

Identifiers

PMID26338787
PMCPMC6557163
OpenAlexW2111015920

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.